[Codestriker-commits] CVS update: codestriker/doc codestriker.sgml
                
                Brought to you by:
                
                    sits
                    
                
            
            
        
        
        
    | 
      
      
      From: <si...@us...> - 2008-02-23 02:17:22
      
     | 
|   User: sits    
  Date: 08/02/22 18:17:15
  Modified:    doc      codestriker.sgml
  Log:
  Commit Rob's documentation changes
  
  
  
  Index: codestriker.sgml
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /cvsroot/codestriker/codestriker/doc/codestriker.sgml,v
  retrieving revision 1.66
  retrieving revision 1.67
  diff -u -r1.66 -r1.67
  --- codestriker.sgml	7 Jun 2007 04:46:27 -0000	1.66
  +++ codestriker.sgml	23 Feb 2008 02:17:15 -0000	1.67
  @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
   <book>
     <bookinfo>
       <title>The Codestriker Guide</title>
  -    <subtitle>Version 1.9.3</subtitle>
  +    <subtitle>Version 1.9.5</subtitle>
       <legalnotice>
  -      <para>Copyright (c) 2001 - 2007</para>
  +      <para>Copyright (c) 2001 - 2008</para>
       </legalnotice>
       <authorgroup>
         <author>
  @@ -629,16 +629,14 @@
   	  been resolved, Codestriker can add in a link to the code
   	  review topic, which shows the actual code which fixed the
   	  bug (and any important decisions made in the Codestriker
  -	  comments).  Currently, there is support for Bugzilla and Flyspray,
  -	  but it is not difficult to add in support for other systems.
  +	  comments).  Currently, there is support for Bugzilla, Flyspray
  +	  and TestDirector, but it is not difficult to add in support
  +          for other systems.
   	</para>
   	<para>
  -	  If you don't use Bugzilla (<ulink
  -	  url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org">http://bugzilla.mozilla.org</ulink>)
  -          or Flyspray,
  -	  you can skip this section, as by default, there is no
  -	  linking to a bug tracking system.  An example configuration
  -	  could be as follows:
  +	  If you don't use a bugtracker you can skip this section,
  +          as by default, there is no linking to a bug tracking system.
  +	  An example configuration could be as follows:
   	  <programlisting>
   # Bug tracking type.
   $bug_db = 'bugzilla';
  @@ -1059,6 +1057,33 @@
             added to the system.
   	</para>
         </sect2>
  +      <sect2>
  +        <title>Scmbug Integration</title>
  +        <para>
  +	  It is possible for Codestriker to integrate with ScmBug
  +	  (<ulink url="http://www.mkgnu.net/?q=scmbug">http://www.mkgnu.net/?q=scmbug</ulink>).
  +	  This allows users to generate a topic based on the changes
  +	  done under a given bug ID (or list of bug IDs).  An example
  +	  configuration is:
  +<programlisting>
  +$scmbug_hostname = 'localhost';
  +$scmbug_port = 3872;
  +$scmbug_lib_dir = 'C:/Program Files/Scmbug/share/scmbug/lib';
  +</programlisting>
  +	</para>
  +        <para>
  +          This would match the default settings used by Scmbug on
  +          Windows.  Where <varname>$scmbug_hostname</varname> and
  +	  <varname>$scmbug_port</varname> are the host
  +          and port of the machine where Scmbug is running.  The
  +          <varname>$scmbug_lib_dir</varname> points to the lib
  +          directory under the Scmbug installation.  If Scmbug is
  +          running on a separate machine a copy of the Scmbug lib
  +          directory needs to be staged on the same machine as
  +          codestriker and the <varname>$scmbug_lib_dir</varname>
  +          variable made to point at this.
  +	</para>
  +      </sect2>
       </sect1>
   
       <sect1 id="running-install.pl">
  @@ -1991,6 +2016,17 @@
   	  which would work on all files located within that path.
   	</para>
         </sect2>
  +      <sect2>
  +        <title>Creating Topics from Bug IDs</title>
  +	<para>
  +	  If you have Codestriker configured to make use of Scmbug
  +	  integration it is possible to generate a Topic by entering a
  +	  list of bug IDs (comma separated).  To generate the topic in
  +	  this way, ensure that the Start Tag, End Tag and Module
  +	  fields are left blank and that the relevant bug IDs are
  +	  entered into the Bug IDs field.
  +	</para>
  +      </sect2>
       </sect1>
       <sect1>
         <title>Reviewing Topics</title>
  
  
  
 |