Thread: [Codestriker-user] lxr enhancement comment
Brought to you by:
sits
From: Darryl O. <da...@so...> - 2003-04-29 15:12:34
|
[ Note: I'm not subscribed to this list. ] Just a comment: for proper lxr support, codestriker needs a way to associate a different base LXR URL with each repository. Just as $file_viewer is a mapping of repositories to filename viewers, there needs to be a mapping of repositories to base LXR URLs (and not all repositories may have an LXR URL). -- Darryl Okahata da...@so... DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Agilent Technologies, or of the little green men that have been following him all day. |
From: David S. <si...@us...> - 2003-04-30 00:39:05
|
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 01:12, Darryl Okahata wrote: > [ Note: I'm not subscribed to this list. ] > > Just a comment: for proper lxr support, codestriker needs a way to > associate a different base LXR URL with each repository. Just as > $file_viewer is a mapping of repositories to filename viewers, there > needs to be a mapping of repositories to base LXR URLs (and not all > repositories may have an LXR URL). Yep - you're right. I'll add that to my list of things to fix for the next release. -- Cheers, David |