On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:40 PM, David Sitsky <david.sitsky@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi David,

Try setting $codestriker_css to the full URL of your test install.


That did not quite work.  However, I found a better solution.  Instead of changing the URL's terminal node by adding "_tst" to it, I added a penultimate node: /tst/codestriker/ for testing, /codestriker/ for deployment.

Thanks for your help.  Now on to see if this fixes my SVN properties bug.


On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:25 AM, David Carson <dccarson@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ummm, I think I've hit this before.  The problem has something to do with my
> attempt to set up a test URL.  I added a second URL to the Apache config.
> Instead of /codestriker/ pointing to the cgi-bin of the real installation, I
> can use /codestriker_tst/ to point to my staging area (and the same for the
> html URL).  But I think this is what confuses Codestriker.
> I have two completely separate directories under /var/www/codestriker.  I
> ran bin/install.pl in each.  Is there a way I can configure so that I can do
> staging experiments on a new version, without displacing the deployed
> version?
> Thanks,
> David
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:49 PM, David Carson <dccarson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> OK, I see there was a fix for binary svn files and changed properties, and
>> it came in 1.9.7.  That may be why my situation does not work, since I've
>> got 1.9.6.
>> So, I've now downloaded 1.9.9 and I'm trying to upgrade.  Did something
>> change with the Help (now Manual) link?  I do not get the right URL:
>>     http://our.host.com/codestriker_tst/codestriker.pl/codestriker.html
>> I should point out that I'm trying to use vanilla 1.9.9 first, before I
>> add all our changes to the .conf file, etc.  The only changes I did make to
>> .conf was to set the user/pass for the DB and to empty out
>> "valid_repositories" and add ours as the single element.
>> Is there something I forgot to set so Manual will actually point to the
>> right place?
>> Thanks,
>> David
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:20 PM, David Sitsky <david.sitsky@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi David,
>>> There has been support for that added in I am pretty sure 1.9.6.
>>> Please try the latest release first - it should be able to handle most
>>> instances.
>>> Cheers,
>>> David
>>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:09 AM, David Carson <dccarson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Is there any support for property changes in the SVN diff parsing
>>> > code?  I
>>> > am currently running 1.9.6 and I would be happy to upgrade if this
>>> > support
>>> > has been added.
>>> >
>>> > (I can't seem to find a Changelog to look at.  Where would I find that,
>>> > and
>>> > does it have this same info in it?)