[Codemill-spec] proposed -L option

[Richard K. <rk...@sw...>]

John Lindal wrote:

> > I think it is important to keep the license template and the code
> > template separate.  Since someone could have the GNU coding style with
> > the BSD license etc...  ( I guess this is what you meant )
>
> Yes, but I doubt most people will need more than one or two combinations
> out of all the possible permutations.  Thus, it seems easier to maintain a
> couple of template files (each one complete in itself for a particular type
> of project), rather than having to specify a long list of template files
> for different purposes (code, license, header, footer, etc.)

Ok, some general temples can be set,
but the power to to funny options must still be there.

I must also say,
I think by default no code, license, header, footer parameters should be
needed for codemill to do it's work,
and none should be added , or worse guessed.

Thanks,
Richard.