Re: [Codemill-spec] Re: name
Status: Planning
Brought to you by:
richard_kolb
From: Richard K. <rk...@sw...> - 2000-12-08 07:46:58
|
Hi All, John Lindal wrote: > > and Code Mill Jnr which is some teaching tool, > > > > won't this cause problems if someone ever copy rights "codemill" ? > > Why bother to copyright the name? Oh , I thought you had to copyright the name to copyright the software, I'll do more research on this ( because I know +- 0 about it) I've written a skeleton of the code mill classes, It's basic target functionality is to create classes for c++/java and add members for c++ /Java. I'm also allowing extra room for other languages and other functionality. I'm hoping to have a small prototype by the new year, written in Linux. Heath , (who is one of my buddies at work ) will ensure it will work correctly in FreeBSD. Would you like to see codemill working in Win32 ? ---- When it comes to parsing , I think using ctags would be a big problem since of those nasty bugs which stop it from working. Doing our own parsing may be difficult at first , but may be the best solution for now. ( I'll write a wrapper so our parsing mechanisms can be easily changed from our own system , to ctags later. ) Thanks, Richard. |