[Cocoapsql-developer] Re: thanks for cocoa psql

[Al K. <al...@ki...>]

Hi Ted.
Regarding the C++ question, my first guess is that it would be better to 
stick with the standard libpq.a as the interface into postgres. My 
reasoning is:
-Tried and true, simple interface for connecting to postgres.
-Part of this project (being developed separately at this time) is to 
objectify access to the database and build an objective-c interface into 
postgress. I am almost ready to add some of this work to the source 
tree. It will provide data update ability from the tableview. To do this 
we need a simple consistent interface into the database -- libpq.a.
-We should be able to port this project to work with other databases, as 
such we should stay with the least common denominator as far as our 
database interface goes. libpq defines what many would consider a fairly 
standard interface into postgres. Many other databases use similar 
interfaces so porting should not be TOOOOO complex.

See ya, Al

Input, Input, need more INPUT!!!!

Note: I have copied that cocoapsql-developer list with this message.

Please join at:

  http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cocoapsql-developer

On Thursday, May 23, 2002, at 07:16 AM, Ted Petrosky wrote:

> Al,
>
> Now that I am getting used to looking at the code..... Have you looked 
> at this
> work:
>
> http://members.ams.chello.nl/j.vermeulen31/proj-libpqxx.html
>
> Nice guy... does anything he is doing help in creating this project? Is 
> the C++
> better/easier to handle, or is it better to import the C? These 
> questions are
> quite beyond me and my technical abilities. I was able to use his libs 
> to create
> 'standard' tools with no problem.
>
> I'll see what I can throw in. The people on the cocoa mail list have 
> been great. I
> hope it stays that way.
>
> Ted