Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] cobolforgcc on AIX (RS6000)

[Curt T. <cu...@cu...>]

My first thought was to test for a previous definition but there is no guarantee the meaning would be the same. The 'COB_' sounds good.

Curt

--- Tim Josling <te...@me...>
> wrote:
>Curt,
>Thanks for the information. How about I change them to COB_*? I
>will run a sed job on the source tree and anything I receive.
>Tim Josling
>
>
>Curt Timmerman wrote:
>> 
>> I ran a quick compile/test of the tolower intrinsic on our AIX box at work and received redefinition errors on the following defines in cobr_temp_config.h:
>> UINT64_MAX
>> INT64_MAX
>> INT64_MIN
>> 
>> These were previously defined in:
>> /usr/include/sys/inttypes.h
>> 
>> ==
>> Curt Timmerman
>> cu...@cu...
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Cobolforgcc-devel mailing list
>Cob...@li...
>http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/cobolforgcc-devel

==
Curt Timmerman
cu...@cu...

_____________________________________________________________

BootBox.Net - Home Of The Totally Free Internet Solution

http://www.bootbox.net

Get an @bootbox.net webmail account - http://webmail.bootbox.net

Host Your Website For Free - http://webhosting.bootbox.net

Put Your E-Commerce Business Online Virtually Free - http://bcommerce.bootbox.net