Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] Lisp for COBOL

[<te...@me...>]

> Tim, do you have any specific Lisp compiler in mind for the final GCC
> COBOL implementation?
> 
> -Tom
> 
> Tom Browder
> Niceville, Florida
> USA
> 

I am mainly using SBCL for development but I also test with gcl. SBCL is a
slower compiler but is more functionally complete (ANSI compliance) and
generates faster code. Gcl has better platform coverage including Microsoft
Windows. I will probably also see if I can get it going with the free
versions of the commercial list compilers. SBCL is a recent offshoot of CMU
Lisp so it should not be too hard to support CMU Lisp too.

Tim
Josling

Message sent using MelbPC WebMail Server