Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] Old cobolforgcc Source
Status: Pre-Alpha
Brought to you by:
timjosling
From: tim <te...@me...> - 2008-01-09 07:21:00
|
Tom, That would be extremely useful, but it would not be a job for the faint-hearted. As an example, I can't get vanilla GCC to build on my PC at the moment on my PC. My intent is to start with "treelang" and add functionality to that. The have kept treelang up to date while I have been away. Regards, Tim Josling On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 15:38 -0600, Tom Browder wrote: > Would it be of any value to the project (and plans) to use the > existing CVS head and try to get it to build with the current gcc > release? > > -Tom > > Tom Browder > Niceville, Florida > USA > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Cobolforgcc-devel mailing list > Cob...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cobolforgcc-devel |