cobolforgcc-devel

[Cobolforgcc-devel] GCC Source Tree

[Tom B. <tom...@gm...>]

Tim, have you thought about getting the current cobol CVS tree
converted and added to the GCC subversion tree now rather than waiting
until you have everything else ready?

-Tom

Tom Browder
Niceville, Florida
USA

Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] GCC Source Tree

[tim <te...@me...>]

Tom,

I'm not sure which version you are talking about - the original C
version or the new Lisp version.

The original version had code that was not assigned to the FSF. Also it
does not work with the current GCC trunk. I think both of these would be
show-stoppers. Normally they wait until the language is more or less
working before incorporating into the GCC SVC tree as a branch and then
at an appropriate time onto the trunk.

The lisp version is too early.

There are disadvantages to being in the GCC SVN so I want to get as as
far as I can before uploading the code there.

Tim Josling

On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 06:56 -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
> Tim, have you thought about getting the current cobol CVS tree
> converted and added to the GCC subversion tree now rather than waiting
> until you have everything else ready?
> 
> -Tom
> 
> Tom Browder
> Niceville, Florida
> USA
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Cobolforgcc-devel mailing list
> Cob...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cobolforgcc-devel

Re: [Cobolforgcc-devel] GCC Source Tree

[Tom B. <tom...@gm...>]

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:15 PM, tim <te...@me...> wrote:
> Tom,
...
>  There are disadvantages to being in the GCC SVN so I want to get as as
>  far as I can before uploading the code there.

That makes sense, thanks.

-Tom