Re: [SPAM-LOW] RE: [Cobertura-devel] Cobertura 1.5

[Jeremy T. <jer...@gm...>]

I made all the changes last night that we mentioned above, but I'm not goin=
g=20
to commit until I have time to integrate pieces of everyone else's patches,=
=20
too (since Grzegorz and James had additional unit tests as well, I'd like t=
o=20
integrate those). I'll do this tonight.

I ended up working much later than I though I would while we were managing =
a=20
release.

Until then...
Jeremy

On 8/1/05, Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@gm...> wrote:
>=20
> I'd rather see us commit / test the multiple fileset fixes and release in=
=20
> a couple of days personally. The multiple fileset thing seems to be the=
=20
> biggest thing that has been asked for by users.=20
>=20
> I agree with the publicity generated by releases, but the more we have,=
=20
> the more people have the potential for thinking that we over-release, so=
=20
> they ignore the new features, especially when they're looking for a featu=
re=20
> (i.e. multiple filesets) and it's not released (i.e. if we release 1.5now=
).
>=20
> Just my $0.02....
>=20
> Just wondering, if I commit the multiple fileset changes tonight.... how=
=20
> many on this list would be willing / able to take the latest build from C=
VS=20
> and test in their setup over the next few days (let's say Tuesday,=20
> Wednesday, Thursday) so that we can be sure it's production-ready, and th=
en=20
> release Friday?
>=20
> If we could have three or more people test it wherever they currently use=
=20
> Cobertura, it would be great. This way we also ensure=20
> backwards-compatibility.
>=20
> Jeremy
>=20
> On 8/1/05, Mark Doliner <Mar...@sa...> wrote:
> >=20
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > To: cob...@li...
> > > Subject: RE: [Cobertura-devel] Cobertura 1.5
> > >
> > > Mark Doliner wrote:=20
> > > > Hi, I'm thinking about releasing Cobertura 1.5 soon.
> > > > It still doesn't supported multiple source
> > > > directories for reporting (I REALLY need to look at
> > > > that patch), or multiple class directories for=20
> > > > instrumenting, but there are a lot of other changes.
> > > > What do you guys think?
> > >
> > > IMHO Without the patch for multiple source directories
> > > I personally do not see the point of a release now.=20
> > > Better to wait for the real thing.
> >=20
> > I've been numbering things like crazy lately:
> >=20
> > 1. Releasing is easy.
> > 2. Releasing gives us publicity (announcement on freshmeat.net=20
> > <http://freshmeat.net>, etc).
> > 3. I'm completely willing to release now and then again a week later.
> > 4. I don't really see a difference between releasing 1.5 now and then=
=20
> > 1.6 next week vs. releasing 1.5beta now and then 1.5final next week.
> > 5. I try to avoid making lots of changes to code and then releasing=20
> > without waiting a few days to let the dust settle. And these changes fo=
r=20
> > multiple source directories seem pretty large, to me
> > 6. There are a lot of changes in 1.5 that I'd like to get out the door.
> >=20
> > -Mark
> >=20
> >=20
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> > from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> > informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> > speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id=16492&opclick<http:=
//ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id%16492&opclick>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cobertura-devel mailing list
> > Cob...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cobertura-devel
> >=20
> >=20
>