RE: [Cobertura-devel] Multiple Source directories

[Mark D. <Mar...@sa...>]

I agree.  So should we go with using nested filesets, or should we mimic =
javac?  Here's an example of each

NESTED FILESETS:
<cobertura-report destdir=3D"${coverage.html.dir}">
  <fileset dir=3D"${src.dir}">
    <include name=3D"**/*.java" />
    <exclude name=3D"**/DebuggingHelper*"/>
    <exclude name=3D"**/Test*"/>
  </fileset>
  <fileset dir=3D"${examples.dir}">
    <include name=3D"**/*.java" />
  </fileset>
</cobertura-report>

MIMIC JAVAC:
<cobertura-report destdir=3D"${coverage.html.dir}">
  <src path=3D"${src.dir}"/>
  <src path=3D"${examples.dir}"/>
  <include name=3D"net/sourceforge/cobertura/**"/>>
  <exclude name=3D"**/DebuggingHelper*"/>
  <exclude name=3D"**/Test*"/>
</javac>

The one reason I don't like the nested filesets is because calling it =
"fileset" doesn't really tell you what it's used for.  Is it possible to =
change that to "source" or something?

-Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Ryan Thomerson [mailto:je...@th...]=20
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 11:07 AM
> To: J. Rentrop; Sinke, Mark (GE Healthcare)
> Cc: Mark Doliner; Seigel, James; cob...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Cobertura-devel] Multiple Source directories
>=20
> I had the same reservatoins.  We should keep our API=20
> (including our ant file
> interface) as consistent between releases as possible, and=20
> especially not
> release something that is a public API (basically) that we=20
> are planning on
> changing soon.
>=20
> Thanks Julien!
>=20
> Jeremy