From: Mark D. <Mar...@sa...> - 2005-05-19 19:14:53
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: cob...@li...=20 > [mailto:cob...@li...] On=20 > Behalf Of Czechowski, Igor > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 11:56 AM > To: Cobertura-devel > Subject: RE: [Cobertura-devel] javanscc jar dependencies ? >=20 > I came up with the two ideas.=20 >=20 > First, what do you think about including other source code metrics > javancss provides in the cobertura report ? I'm not sure I see a big advantage to that. I think I'd rather see work = being done more toward fixing the bugs that already exist, than toward = merging in lots of code that isn't really related. I'm not against having a nice, unified view of lots of fancy metrics, = but I think that would be handled better as an independent project than = as an addition to Cobertura. I guess I'm a student of the "write a = program to do one thing and do it well" mentality. > So the scenario would be to produce the entire html report=20 > and only the > package overview of the xml one. Then I would use transformation to > produce the html page for the cruisecontrol. I can merge the existing > xml report but I thing it's a little bit over reporting for me at the > current state. Hmm. I guess you could accomplish something along these lines by = generating the XML report then merging it into the CruiseControl build = log (the same way Junit XML is merged). Then you would need to add an = xsl transform for displaying a coverage summary to the CruiseControl = build results page. -Mark |