RE: [Cobertura-devel] Report Question

[Mark D. <Mar...@sa...>]

The log4j properties file is really the only way to change the level of =
information printed.  I'm suppose you could run your code in a debugger, =
but I'm not sure if that would accomplish very much.
=20
About the syncrhonized block thing... that's very possible, I'll try to =
take a look at that sometime.
-Mark
=20


________________________________

	From: Martha Yanez [mailto:my...@us...]=20
	Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 10:34 AM
	To: Mark Doliner
	Cc: cob...@li...
	Subject: RE: [Cobertura-devel] Report Question
=09
=09

	Hi Mark,=20
	I'll try reproducing the the finally error but in case I'm not =
sucessful are there any traces that I can take with my current code =
(Grzegorz indicated the debug option in log4j properties file but I =
don't see much recorded when I run test).=20
=09
	I've noticed the end bracket being counted as zero in almost every =
synchronized block that I've seen and almost all of them are not at the =
end of a method. I think there is a problem with that particular key =
word/block=20
=09
	Thanks=20
=09
	Martha Yanez
	(919) 224-1320 / 8-687-1320
	New Notes id: Martha Yanez/Raleigh/IBM
	my...@us...
=09
=09
=09
=09
=09
"Mark Doliner" <Mar...@sa...>=20
Sent by: cob...@li...=20

04/07/2005 09:27 AM=20

To
Martha Yanez/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <cob...@li...>=20
cc
Subject
RE: [Cobertura-devel] Report Question

=09




	> Hello all=20
	> I've gotten reports to run (many thanks to Grzegorz) and am slowly =
starting to analyze some results most of which look accurate.=20
	> However I'm seeing some odd items like the  following:=20
	>=20
	>  353            finally=20
	>  354            {=20
	>  355  0             if (allOK)=20
	>  356                {    // Life is WONDERFUL!!!  Issue MEM started  =
message=20
	>  357  3                 status =3D Status.STATUS_RUNNING;=20
	>  358                     =
xLogger.message(IRecordType.TYPE_INFO,CLASSNAME,methodName,"DYKME9016I");=
=20
	>  359                }=20
	>  360                else=20
	>  361                {=20
	>  362  0                 status =3D Status.STATUS_FAILED;       // =
very important to set=20
	>=20
	> Line 355 is highlited in pink and show zero coverage yet it was =
definitely executed as indicated by line 357 and the appearence of the =
message=20
	> on my console.=20
=09
	That definitely shouldn't be happening...  If you're able to reproduce =
this in a small, hello world-like program then it would be great if you =
could file a bug report about it.
=09
	> Another one is:=20
	>  246  3          synchronized(this)=20
	>  247             {=20
	>  248  3             if (status =3D=3D STATUS_STARTING)=20
	>  249                {=20
	>  250  3                  status =3D STATUS_STEADY_STATE;=20
	>  251  3                  threadSuspended =3D false;=20
	>  252  3                  notify();=20
	>  253                }=20
	>  254  0         }=20
	>=20
	> Line 254 which is simply the closing bracket of a block that has been =
executed is showing a zero count.=20
=09
	For this one, line 254 should probably not be considered a line of =
code.  Is this block at the end of a method?  At the end of methods that =
return void, I belive a "return" instruction is added in the bytecode, =
even if one is not explictly stated in the code.  Maybe Cobertura is =
looking at line 254 as this implicit return instruction?
=09
	-Mark
=09
=09
	-------------------------------------------------------
	SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
	Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real =
users.
	Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
	http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id=14396&op=3Dclick
	_______________________________________________
	Cobertura-devel mailing list
	Cob...@li...
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cobertura-devel
=09
=09