Re: [Cobertura-devel] Branch Coverage Showing as NA

[John W. L. <Joh...@sa...>]

That is odd behavior.  I am not sure what is going on.

Since you said your build tool puts the source and classes in different directories, you would have cobertura-instrument point to the classes and have cobertura-report point to the source.

Can I see your commands?

John


From: karl francis [mailto:klj...@ho...]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 11:07 AM
To: cob...@li...
Subject: [Cobertura-devel] Branch Coverage Showing as NA

When I instrument the code and the .java file and .class file are in the same directory I get branch coverage numbers in the report.
When I instrument the code and the .java file is NOT available, I don't get branch coverage numbers in the report.  My build tool puts the .class files in a different directory that the .java files.  Does cobertura-instrument.sh support specifying a source directory?  Why is the source needed for branch coverage numbers to be generated?

Thanks,

Karl