Re: [Cobertura-devel] Possible bug in html reporting file

[Steven C. <ste...@re...>]

I know the percentage is HORRIBLE. This is new feature development I'm 
working on. Getting it to work was a tough task alone, but testing with 
cobertura shows I have a lot of testing development to do! I was 
wondering if it should still produce 0% coverage, even though there are 
a few lines of code that are hit. If you want, I can take a look at the 
code base and provide a fix, and submit it. I've been wanting to 
contribute for a while now :)

On 12/30/2010 2:26 AM, John W. Lewis wrote:
> 3/2300 gives you 0.13%.   I assume it is being rounded/truncated to the nearest percentage point.
>
> The most horrible thing about it is that there is no more than 1% coverage.  :)
>
> I'm glad you got it working.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Christou [mailto:ste...@re...]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 7:25 PM
> To: cob...@li...
> Subject: [Cobertura-devel] Possible bug in html reporting file
>
> I believe I might have found a bug in the HTML format report. If you have a file that has about 3 lines of coverage, but contains about 2300 lines of code (I know this is HORRIBLE), it produces a result of 0% coverage. I assume it should be producing a result of 1%, because there still is coverage in the file, it's just not a lot of coverage.
> Email Disclaimer:
> http://www.redprairie.com/emaildisclaimer/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
> _______________________________________________
> Cobertura-devel mailing list
> Cob...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cobertura-devel
>
Email Disclaimer:
http://www.redprairie.com/emaildisclaimer/