From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-09-15 14:08:13
|
Patches item #2859245, was opened at 2009-09-15 05:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by thekingant You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=720017&aid=2859245&group_id=130558 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Joachim Hofer (jmhofer) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Removed oro regex dependency & some collection cleanup Initial Comment: Hi! While trying to understand the cobertura code, I did a few simple modifications: I removed the dependency on the Apache ORO matcher in favor of java.util.regex. - Or is there a reason for using ORO instead? Also, I did some collections cleanup concerning generics for increased type-safety. Also, I corrected a typo in ClassInstrumenter (regexs vs regexes). - I've now discovered that there's already another patch for that on the tracker. I hope you find this useful. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Doliner (thekingant) Date: 2009-09-15 07:08 Message: My guess at the reason for using Apache ORO is that java.util.regex wasn't added until java 1.4, and Cobertura used to be compatible with Java 1.3. But I think that compatibility has been dropped, so I think this should be fine. But I'm sure the ever-wise John Lewis will take a look at it ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=720017&aid=2859245&group_id=130558 |