Re: [CLucene-dev] file release

[Ben v. K. <s40...@st...>]

I believe the release candidate for java lucene 1.3 does this.
I want to upgrade clucene code to 1.3. But only when it's a stable release.

cheers,
ben

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 23:47:53 -0400, <am...@ma...> wrote:

> Hi Ben
>
> Well, I was just thinking ahead and while browsing the Lucene list 
> someone
> mentioned that they extended the ability of Lucene to actually pick
> Analyzers
> on a per field basis (there was some java code supplied as a sample),
> which was intriguing in itself because it would open up alot of new
> possiblities
> for indexing various types of data.
>
> But for now I'll just settle with what we got here, I'm not complaining,
> StandardAnalyzer is good enough for me :0
>
> thanks
>
> -pedja
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ben van Klinken" <s40...@st...>
> To: <clu...@li...>
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 7:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] file release
>
>
>> Pedja,
>>
>> I don't think it matters. The standardanalyzer has slightly more 
>> overhead
>> than the simpleanalyzer so it's better to use it where possible. THe
>> analyzers are only used when dealing with queries or when inserting
>> documents(to split the text up into words). The optimize and open
> functions
>> doesn't do that.
>>
>> However, it might be a better idea to have a global, or a resource based
>> analyzer - with the future possibility of choosing which analyzer to 
>> use.
>> Then analysers don't need to be loaded for each operation since the same
>> analyzer would be used. I don't think it's a priority, but if you want 
>> to
>> work on it your more than welcome to.
>>
>> hope that's ok,
>>
>> cheers,
>> ben
>>
>> On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 15:42:33 -0400, <am...@ma...> wrote:
>>
>> > So what is the concensus on the use of Analyzers in CLucene ?
>> >
>> > I wonder because I see in the DLL/PHP wrapper we are still creating
>> > or opening an index using a SimpleAnalyzer and optimizing with the 
>> same
>> > yet using StandardAnalyzer to insert, search or delete a document.
>> >
>> > I know I dont want to sound as if I'm nagging about this, I just want 
>> to
>> > get
>> > it out of the way and move on with other things :)
>> >
>> > Hopefully I can get this newest PHP extension to work fully and then
> post
>> > it up for testing and c&c.
>> >
>> >
>> > thanks
>> >
>> > -pedja
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -------------------------------------------------------
>> > This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations
>> > Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge
>> > We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win 
>> $100
>> > http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > CLucene-developers mailing list
>> > CLu...@li...
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations
>> Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge
>> We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100
>> http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54
>> _______________________________________________
>> CLucene-developers mailing list
>> CLu...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers
>>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations
> Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge
> We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100
> http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54
> _______________________________________________
> CLucene-developers mailing list
> CLu...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers
>
>