Re: [CLucene-dev] CLucene Analyzers choice and use ?

[<rg...@sd...>]

>>>>> "amigo" == amigo  <am...@ma...> writes:
amigo> 
amigo> Hi all,
amigo> While playing with the Java Lucene, getting it connected to PHP
amigo> I was reading some its docs and it says there that documents
amigo> should be indexed and querried with the same Analyzer.
amigo> 
amigo> Now I went back to the dll/php wrapper code supplied with
amigo> CLucene and going through the dll wrapper there's alot of
amigo> mixing and matching, so I wonder if that's an error or not in
amigo> it, because it uses different analyzers for different things?
amigo> 
amigo> For example: API method CL_Open goes to open/create the CLucene
amigo> index with a SimpleAnalyzer, and so does the CL_Optimize and
amigo> CL_Search, yet on the other hand CL_Insert_Document and
amigo> CL_Delete use StandardAnalyzer.
amigo> 
amigo> Can't say I to worried about optimize or delete right now,
amigo> though they are also important functions, but shouldn't insert
amigo> and search use the same analyzer?
amigo> 
amigo> Would that be the reason that some of the queries do not come
amigo> out the way they should, ie return all/proper hits?

I don't know.  I have to check to see if the demo program uses
different analyzers.

amigo> P.S. Rob excellent job on the patch, I still haven't crashed
amigo> your code :-)

Thanks -- I'm sure that some of the fixes will be re-done differently
and better in the end.

--Rob