Re: [CLucene-dev] license

[Jimmy P. <jp...@sd...>]

Hey Ben,

I read the Apache licenese and it is very simple and doesn't place any
unreasonable obligations on the user.  I would not have an issue with
clucene being changed to Apache.

Who is Max, and what is he trying to say.  "That is not a good result
for a proprietary project" means what?  What is not a good result?
Also forgive what might be a rhetorical question, but what does Max
mean when he says Lucene is proprietary. Does he mean to say that
clucene is in violation of the Apache license?  And what does Max mean
by saying, "I have to make some decisions"?

Regards, 
  Jimmy.

 
"Ben van Klinken" <be...@vi...> writes:

>     Hi guys,
> 
> I got an email:
> -----
> That is not a good result for a proprietary project. :(. Perhaps you guys
> should consider Apache, which is what lucene is under. Anyway, if you find
> out quickly I would really appreciate it - I have to make some decisions.
> 
> Thanks a lot,
> 
> Max.
> ------
> 
> What do you think? Is it better that it is the same as lucene.
> Jimmy i know we talked about this, but maybe apache is better? If that still
> is ok with your project.
> 
> Ben
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
> Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
> _______________________________________________
> CLucene-developers mailing list
> CLu...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers