From: Veit J. <nun...@go...> - 2012-08-15 09:58:55
|
Hi Atul! 2012/8/15 Atul Kulkarni <atu...@gm...>: > Hi All, > > I recently stumbled upon CLucene and am wondering if this is actively > developed anymore? CLucene is still active---more or less... For myself, I'm very busy with other projects distracting me from working on CLucene. > Also, is there a TODO list that I can look at to pickup a > bug or something like a bug tracker to help me pickup something simple to > start with? Firstly, there are some open tickets provided from users: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=80013&atid=558446 Secondly, we also started to update CLucene to the one of the latest Lucene version. This port was supposed to be based on Lucene++, which is also a Lucene port. But it makes a heavy use of shared pointer. And we once wanted to make this the new CLucene, but reduce the usage of shared pointer and make it as fast as possible. Lucene++ is hosted at GitHub: https://github.com/luceneplusplus/LucenePlusPlus. Some tests and improvements are already done by Sergey. Can be found an Github also: https://github.com/drigh/LucenePlusPlus/ >From my point of view, it would be better to start with Lucene++. If you are intersted, you are invited to work on one of the issues. And I think I can spent some time to support, at least for answering your questions. Best regards, Veit |