From: Veit J. <nun...@go...> - 2012-03-18 00:09:38
|
2012/2/28 <du...@id...>: >> Maybe Lucene++ [1] supports this. It is a port of a later Lucene version >> by >> Alan and Ben. We tried once to make this the new CLucene version, but >> havn't finished it yet. > > How stable is Lucene++? Does it just have some unimplemented functionality > from java lucene or is there other problems? Sorry for coming back to your question so late. Somehow I thought, I had already answered it. As far as I know Lucene++ is stable. For CLucene we wanted it as fast as possible, i.e., reducing the usage of the shared pointers in Lucene++. Kind regards, Veit |