Re: [CLucene-dev] Clucene packaging

[Giorgio Z. <gio...@gm...>]

> 2. I've been working on a new version of CLucene with Alan Wright.
> This new version is called Lucene++, is compatible with Java Lucene
> 3.0.3 and is heavily built with boost (full use of shared_ptr, and a
> lot of other areas), and thus avoids many of the problems that users
> have with memory handling and bugs relating to threading, etc. For a
> number of reasons, I've decided not to try and merge the two projects.
> For one, I think that CLucene still has a place (in fact I'm also
> doing some work on CLucene - read below): namely for projects who
> don't want or can't handle the overhead that Lucene++'s heavy use of
> boost creates - such as on mobiles.
>   - see http://www.github.com/ustramooner/LucenePlusPlus
> 1a. I've created python bindings around Lucene++
>   - see http://www.github.com/ustramooner/python-lucenepp


For embedded then it make more sense than converting CLucene in a pure
C engine, but i feel
that there are not the resources to do it.
For high performance computation it makes sense using boost. Great work!


-- 
Quiero ser el rayo de sol que cada día te despierta
para hacerte respirar y vivir en me.
"Favola -Moda".