Menu
▾
▴
clucene-developers — CLucene development-related discussion.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(56) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(62) |
Oct
(71) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
|
Apr
(62) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(81) |
Dec
(41) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(70) |
Feb
(51) |
Mar
(46) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(54) |
Dec
(68) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(43) |
Mar
(64) |
Apr
(141) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(101) |
Jul
(112) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(85) |
Oct
(63) |
Nov
(84) |
Dec
(81) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(64) |
Mar
(46) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(34) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(25) |
Nov
(12) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(18) |
Jun
(47) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(61) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(79) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(48) |
Feb
(50) |
Mar
(28) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(51) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(125) |
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(38) |
Oct
(29) |
Nov
(58) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(81) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(82) |
Sep
(84) |
Oct
(35) |
Nov
(43) |
Dec
(26) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(10) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(8) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2025 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Emerson E. <eme...@gm...> - 2011-11-30 19:56:26
|
Should I include the BrazilianAnalyzer dir? []'s Emerson de Lira Espínola ** <eme...@gm...> <https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola> <http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com> <http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> 2011/11/30 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...> > I included only the CLucene.h. > > > []'s > Emerson de Lira Espínola > ** <eme...@gm...> > <https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> > <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola> > <http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> > <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com> <http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> > <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> > > <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> > > > 2011/11/30 Veit Jahns <nun...@go...> > >> 2011/11/30 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...> >> > >> > Here my code goes attached. >> >> The code looks good. >> >> > If it was a missing include I think it wouldn't even compile, and I >> also used the namespace macros. >> >> I didn't mean the includes in CLucene, but the includes in your >> application. Did you only include the main CLucene.h? If so, did you >> added the BrazilianAnalyzer.h? Or did you include the >> BrazilianAnalyzer.h directly? >> >> Veit >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure >> contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, >> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this >> data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d >> _______________________________________________ >> CLucene-developers mailing list >> CLu...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >> > > |
|
From: Emerson E. <eme...@gm...> - 2011-11-30 19:55:02
|
I included only the CLucene.h. []'s Emerson de Lira Espínola ** <eme...@gm...> <https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola> <http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com> <http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> 2011/11/30 Veit Jahns <nun...@go...> > 2011/11/30 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...> > > > > Here my code goes attached. > > The code looks good. > > > If it was a missing include I think it wouldn't even compile, and I also > used the namespace macros. > > I didn't mean the includes in CLucene, but the includes in your > application. Did you only include the main CLucene.h? If so, did you > added the BrazilianAnalyzer.h? Or did you include the > BrazilianAnalyzer.h directly? > > Veit > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > |
|
From: Veit J. <nun...@go...> - 2011-11-30 19:46:49
|
2011/11/30 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...> > > Here my code goes attached. The code looks good. > If it was a missing include I think it wouldn't even compile, and I also used the namespace macros. I didn't mean the includes in CLucene, but the includes in your application. Did you only include the main CLucene.h? If so, did you added the BrazilianAnalyzer.h? Or did you include the BrazilianAnalyzer.h directly? Veit |
|
From: Ahmed <ci7...@gm...> - 2011-11-30 17:12:35
|
Hi, I want to build a custom filter that separate words, i mean if it find a word like: test123 it will convert it to: test 123 my implementation is this: http://pastebin.com/x7wkdKVC http://pastebin.com/y1WG8CjN the problem is that this analyzer when it separte words it they are converted to exact match query, in the prevois example i want the query to be: (test 123) but what i get is: ("test 123") how can i fix that? thank you |
|
From: Veit J. <nun...@go...> - 2011-11-30 09:19:04
|
Hi Emerson! 2011/11/28 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...> > > Sorry about the confusion. > I got it. I ported the BrazilianAnalyzer do CLucene. At least it compiles successfuly. I used Lucene 2.3.2 as you said and I ported it using StardardAnalyzer as model. I didn't port some constructors because I knew I was only going to use the default. > > However when I take the lib to my application's directory I can't compile my application because it says that : "Error 1 error C2039: 'BrazilianAnalyzer' : is not a member of 'lucene::analysis::standard'..." > > It can't compile this line: > > standard::BrazilianAnalyzer *an = new standard::BrazilianAnalyzer(); > > I put it in the standard namespace just for unit tests purposes. Is there any thing that I missed? Hard to tell without looking at the code. But some ideas: - A missing include? - Can resolve this by using the CLucene's namespace macros? Kind regards, Veit |
|
From: pradeepa k. <cdp...@gm...> - 2011-11-29 22:54:07
|
Hi I am a C++ developer and would like to volunteer in development tasks Could you pease let me know how and where do I start Thanks |
|
From: Emerson E. <eme...@gm...> - 2011-11-28 17:15:41
|
Sorry about the confusion. I got it. I ported the BrazilianAnalyzer do CLucene. At least it compiles successfuly. I used Lucene 2.3.2 as you said and I ported it using StardardAnalyzer as model. I didn't port some constructors because I knew I was only going to use the default. However when I take the lib to my application's directory I can't compile my application because it says that : "Error 1 error C2039: 'BrazilianAnalyzer' : is not a member of 'lucene::analysis::standard'..." It can't compile this line: standard::BrazilianAnalyzer *an = new standard::BrazilianAnalyzer(); I put it in the standard namespace just for unit tests purposes. Is there any thing that I missed? Thanks in advance. []'s Emerson de Lira Espínola ** <eme...@gm...> <https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola> <http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com> <http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> 2011/11/22 Veit Jahns <nun...@go...> > Hi Emerson, > > from where do you port these classes? From Java Lucene 2.3.2 or > Lucene++? My original idea was to port these classes from Java Lucene, > as CLucene is a port of Java Lucene 2.3.2. > > Kind regards, > > Veit > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > |
|
From: Veit J. <nun...@go...> - 2011-11-22 18:56:17
|
Hi Emerson, from where do you port these classes? From Java Lucene 2.3.2 or Lucene++? My original idea was to port these classes from Java Lucene, as CLucene is a port of Java Lucene 2.3.2. Kind regards, Veit |
|
From: Emerson E. <eme...@gm...> - 2011-11-22 12:25:58
|
Has anyone seen these classes before? What would be another alternative to port them? []'s Emerson de Lira Espínola ** <eme...@gm...> <https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola> <http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com> <http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> 2011/11/19 Emerson Espinola <eme...@gm...> > I don't know. I'm not familiar with those classes. I'm trying to port them. > > Enviado via iPhone > > Em 19/11/2011, às 13:03, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@co...> escreveu: > > ReaderPtr? that's an LPP class?! > > 2011/11/18 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...> > >> Hi. I'm porting BrazillianAnalyzer from Java do C++. >> I could compile already BrazilianStemFilter.cpp/.h. >> Now I'm trying to make BrazillianAnalyzer.cpp/.h compile. But I getting >> some errors. >> >> For example BrazillianAnalyzer.java extends from StopwordAnalyzerBase, >> but I couldn't find this class in CLucene. >> It also uses LuceneVersion, ReaderPtr, and TokenStreamPtr, but I >> couldn't find these classes too. Are there their implementations in CLucene >> with another name? >> >> I downloaded clucene-core-2.3.3.4. >> >> >> []'s >> Emerson de Lira Espínola >> ** >> <eme...@gm...> >> <https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> >> <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola> >> <http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> >> <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com> >> <http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> >> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> >> >> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> >> >> >> 2011/11/7 Bořivoj Kostka <ko...@to...> >> >>> Well, I was talking about version 2.3; you can download it from >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/clucene/**** >>> >>> I guess the stemming from this version could be adapted for 0.9 >>> (probably some small modifications will be needed), if you cannot upgrade. >>> **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Regards**** >>> >>> Borek**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> *From:* Emerson Espínola [mailto:eme...@gm...] >>> *Sent:* Monday, November 07, 2011 7:08 PM >>> >>> *To:* clu...@li... >>> *Subject:* Re: [CLucene-dev] Indexing a document**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> The version that I have here is clucene-core-0.9.21b and I don't see >>> this inside src folder. My structure is >>> "clucene-core-0.9.21b\src\CLucene\analysis\standard". :( >>> >>> >>> []'s >>> Emerson de Lira Espínola >>> <~WRD000.jpg> <eme...@gm...><~WRD000.jpg><https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> >>> <~WRD000.jpg> <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <~WRD000.jpg><http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> >>> <image002.jpg> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola><~WRD000.jpg><http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> >>> <~WRD000.jpg> <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com><~WRD000.jpg><http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> >>> <~WRD000.jpg> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> >>> >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> 2011/11/7 Bořivoj Kostka <ko...@to...>**** >>> >>> It is located in src/contribs-lib/CLucene/snowball**** >>> >>> You must enable building contribs-lib when you run cmake.**** >>> >>> As far as I know it is standard part of CLucene source package**** >>> >>> Borek**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *From:* Emerson Espínola [mailto:eme...@gm...] >>> *Sent:* Monday, November 07, 2011 4:53 PM**** >>> >>> >>> *To:* clu...@li... >>> *Subject:* Re: [CLucene-dev] Indexing a document**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Really?**** >>> >>> >>> >>> That would help me a lot. Regarding stemm there are no much differences. >>> How do I get it? Is contribs-lib a folder? If so I couldn't find it. >>> >>> []'s >>> Emerson de Lira Espínola**** >>> >>> <~WRD000.jpg> <eme...@gm...><~WRD000.jpg><https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> >>> <~WRD000.jpg> <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <~WRD000.jpg><http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> >>> <image003.jpg> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola><~WRD000.jpg><http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> >>> <~WRD000.jpg> <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com><~WRD000.jpg><http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> >>> <~WRD000.jpg> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> 2011/11/7 Bořivoj Kostka <ko...@to...>**** >>> >>> Emerson**** >>> >>> There is portuguese stemmer in contribs-lib (snowball). I don’t know how >>> much written brazillian differs from portuguese, but perhaps this could be >>> also (at least partial) solution.**** >>> >>> Regards**** >>> >>> Borek**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> *From:* Emerson Espínola [mailto:eme...@gm...] >>> *Sent:* Monday, November 07, 2011 3:28 PM >>> *To:* clu...@li... >>> *Subject:* Re: [CLucene-dev] Indexing a document**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> 2011/11/7 Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@co...>**** >>> >>> Yeah, shouldn't be too hard to pull off**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Emerson Espínola < >>> eme...@gm...> wrote:**** >>> >>> So the better way for me would be porting BrazillianAnalyzer from >>> Lucene, wouldn't it? Because if I use the [1] I'll probably have problems >>> because it depends on something (.h files) that are not implemented >>> already. Is that right?**** >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> 2011/11/7 Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@co...>**** >>> >>> Thats going to take a while, unfortunately. LPP is already available on >>> github, but we want to have some improvements made to its core before >>> merging it to CLucene**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Emerson Espínola < >>> eme...@gm...> wrote:**** >>> >>> Thank you Viet. >>> >>> When will this new version of CLucene be ready? Any idea?**** >>> >>> >>> >>> []'s >>> Emerson de Lira Espínola**** >>> >>> 2011/11/5 Veit Jahns <nun...@go...>**** >>> >>> Hi Emerson! >>> >>> 2011/11/4 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...>**** >>> >>> >>> I'm willing to write the BrazillianAnalyzer. What should I do? Do you >>> have an idea about how much time is needed to write it? 1 week? 2 weeks? 1 >>> month?**** >>> >>> >>> If the BrazillianAnalyzer from Java Lucene fits your needs, then the >>> only thing you have to do is to port this Analyzer to CLucene. I did the >>> same once for the GermanAnalyzer and I needed more or less a day. >>> >>> BTW, a while ago we started to work on a new code base for CLucene based >>> on Lucene++. Lucene++ has already a BrazillianAnalyzer [1]. But it is based >>> on a newer version of Java Lucene. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Veit >>> >>> [1] >>> https://github.com/luceneplusplus/LucenePlusPlus/tree/e28b15b02ff9de2208965e9af8eb80983380cdcd/src/contrib/analyzers/common/analysis/br >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >>> Save $700 by Nov 18 >>> Register now >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1**** >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CLucene-developers mailing list >>> CLu...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers**** >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >>> Save $700 by Nov 18 >>> Register now >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CLucene-developers mailing list >>> CLu...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >>> Save $700 by Nov 18 >>> Register now >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CLucene-developers mailing list >>> CLu...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >>> Save $700 by Nov 18 >>> Register now >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CLucene-developers mailing list >>> CLu...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >>> Save $700 by Nov 18 >>> Register now >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CLucene-developers mailing list >>> CLu...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >>> Save $700 by Nov 18 >>> Register now >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CLucene-developers mailing list >>> CLu...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >>> Save $700 by Nov 18 >>> Register now >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CLucene-developers mailing list >>> CLu...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >>> Save $700 by Nov 18 >>> Register now >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CLucene-developers mailing list >>> CLu...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure >> contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, >> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this >> data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d >> _______________________________________________ >> CLucene-developers mailing list >> CLu...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > |
|
From: Emerson E. <eme...@gm...> - 2011-11-19 22:43:51
|
I don't know. I'm not familiar with those classes. I'm trying to port them. Enviado via iPhone Em 19/11/2011, às 13:03, Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@co...> escreveu: > ReaderPtr? that's an LPP class?! > > 2011/11/18 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...> > Hi. I'm porting BrazillianAnalyzer from Java do C++. > I could compile already BrazilianStemFilter.cpp/.h. > Now I'm trying to make BrazillianAnalyzer.cpp/.h compile. But I getting some errors. > > For example BrazillianAnalyzer.java extends from StopwordAnalyzerBase, but I couldn't find this class in CLucene. > It also uses LuceneVersion, ReaderPtr, and TokenStreamPtr, but I couldn't find these classes too. Are there their implementations in CLucene with another name? > > I downloaded clucene-core-2.3.3.4. > > > []'s > Emerson de Lira Espínola > > > > > > 2011/11/7 Bořivoj Kostka <ko...@to...> > Well, I was talking about version 2.3; you can download it from http://sourceforge.net/projects/clucene/ > > I guess the stemming from this version could be adapted for 0.9 (probably some small modifications will be needed), if you cannot upgrade. > > > > Regards > > Borek > > > > From: Emerson Espínola [mailto:eme...@gm...] > Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 7:08 PM > > > To: clu...@li... > Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] Indexing a document > > > The version that I have here is clucene-core-0.9.21b and I don't see this inside src folder. My structure is "clucene-core-0.9.21b\src\CLucene\analysis\standard". :( > > > > []'s > Emerson de Lira Espínola > <~WRD000.jpg><~WRD000.jpg><~WRD000.jpg> <~WRD000.jpg> <image002.jpg><~WRD000.jpg><~WRD000.jpg><~WRD000.jpg><~WRD000.jpg> > > > > 2011/11/7 Bořivoj Kostka <ko...@to...> > > It is located in src/contribs-lib/CLucene/snowball > > You must enable building contribs-lib when you run cmake. > > As far as I know it is standard part of CLucene source package > > Borek > > > > From: Emerson Espínola [mailto:eme...@gm...] > Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 4:53 PM > > > To: clu...@li... > Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] Indexing a document > > > > Really? > > > > That would help me a lot. Regarding stemm there are no much differences. How do I get it? Is contribs-lib a folder? If so I couldn't find it. > > []'s > Emerson de Lira Espínola > > <~WRD000.jpg><~WRD000.jpg><~WRD000.jpg> <~WRD000.jpg> <image003.jpg><~WRD000.jpg><~WRD000.jpg><~WRD000.jpg><~WRD000.jpg> > > > > 2011/11/7 Bořivoj Kostka <ko...@to...> > > Emerson > > There is portuguese stemmer in contribs-lib (snowball). I don’t know how much written brazillian differs from portuguese, but perhaps this could be also (at least partial) solution. > > Regards > > Borek > > > > From: Emerson Espínola [mailto:eme...@gm...] > Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 3:28 PM > To: clu...@li... > Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] Indexing a document > > > > Thank you. > > 2011/11/7 Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@co...> > > Yeah, shouldn't be too hard to pull off > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...> wrote: > > So the better way for me would be porting BrazillianAnalyzer from Lucene, wouldn't it? Because if I use the [1] I'll probably have problems because it depends on something (.h files) that are not implemented already. Is that right? > > > > 2011/11/7 Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@co...> > > Thats going to take a while, unfortunately. LPP is already available on github, but we want to have some improvements made to its core before merging it to CLucene > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...> wrote: > > Thank you Viet. > > When will this new version of CLucene be ready? Any idea? > > > > []'s > Emerson de Lira Espínola > > 2011/11/5 Veit Jahns <nun...@go...> > > Hi Emerson! > > 2011/11/4 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...> > > > I'm willing to write the BrazillianAnalyzer. What should I do? Do you have an idea about how much time is needed to write it? 1 week? 2 weeks? 1 month? > > > If the BrazillianAnalyzer from Java Lucene fits your needs, then the only thing you have to do is to port this Analyzer to CLucene. I did the same once for the GermanAnalyzer and I needed more or less a day. > > BTW, a while ago we started to work on a new code base for CLucene based on Lucene++. Lucene++ has already a BrazillianAnalyzer [1]. But it is based on a newer version of Java Lucene. > > Kind regards, > > Veit > > [1] https://github.com/luceneplusplus/LucenePlusPlus/tree/e28b15b02ff9de2208965e9af8eb80983380cdcd/src/contrib/analyzers/common/analysis/br > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > > > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers |
|
From: Emerson E. <eme...@gm...> - 2011-11-07 15:53:40
|
Really? That would help me a lot. Regarding stemm there are no much differences. How do I get it? Is contribs-lib a folder? If so I couldn't find it. []'s Emerson de Lira Espínola ** <eme...@gm...> <https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola> <http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com> <http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> 2011/11/7 Bořivoj Kostka <ko...@to...> > Emerson**** > > There is portuguese stemmer in contribs-lib (snowball). I don’t know how > much written brazillian differs from portuguese, but perhaps this could be > also (at least partial) solution.**** > > Regards**** > > Borek**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Emerson Espínola [mailto:eme...@gm...] > *Sent:* Monday, November 07, 2011 3:28 PM > *To:* clu...@li... > *Subject:* Re: [CLucene-dev] Indexing a document**** > > ** ** > > Thank you. > > 2011/11/7 Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@co...>**** > > Yeah, shouldn't be too hard to pull off**** > > ** ** > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Emerson Espínola < > eme...@gm...> wrote:**** > > So the better way for me would be porting BrazillianAnalyzer from Lucene, > wouldn't it? Because if I use the [1] I'll probably have problems because > it depends on something (.h files) that are not implemented already. Is > that right?**** > > > **** > > 2011/11/7 Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@co...>**** > > Thats going to take a while, unfortunately. LPP is already available on > github, but we want to have some improvements made to its core before > merging it to CLucene**** > > ** ** > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Emerson Espínola < > eme...@gm...> wrote:**** > > Thank you Viet. > > When will this new version of CLucene be ready? Any idea?**** > > > > []'s > Emerson de Lira Espínola > > > **** > > 2011/11/5 Veit Jahns <nun...@go...>**** > > Hi Emerson! > > 2011/11/4 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...>**** > > > I'm willing to write the BrazillianAnalyzer. What should I do? Do you have > an idea about how much time is needed to write it? 1 week? 2 weeks? 1 month? > **** > > > If the BrazillianAnalyzer from Java Lucene fits your needs, then the only > thing you have to do is to port this Analyzer to CLucene. I did the same > once for the GermanAnalyzer and I needed more or less a day. > > BTW, a while ago we started to work on a new code base for CLucene based > on Lucene++. Lucene++ has already a BrazillianAnalyzer [1]. But it is based > on a newer version of Java Lucene. > > Kind regards, > > Veit > > [1] > https://github.com/luceneplusplus/LucenePlusPlus/tree/e28b15b02ff9de2208965e9af8eb80983380cdcd/src/contrib/analyzers/common/analysis/br > **** > > ** ** > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1**** > > > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers**** > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers**** > > ** ** > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers**** > > ** ** > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers**** > > ** ** > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers**** > > ** ** > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > |
|
From: Bořivoj K. <ko...@to...> - 2011-11-07 15:21:45
|
Emerson There is portuguese stemmer in contribs-lib (snowball). I don’t know how much written brazillian differs from portuguese, but perhaps this could be also (at least partial) solution. Regards Borek From: Emerson Espínola [mailto:eme...@gm...] Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 3:28 PM To: clu...@li... Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] Indexing a document Thank you. 2011/11/7 Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@co...<mailto:it...@co...>> Yeah, shouldn't be too hard to pull off On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...<mailto:eme...@gm...>> wrote: So the better way for me would be porting BrazillianAnalyzer from Lucene, wouldn't it? Because if I use the [1] I'll probably have problems because it depends on something (.h files) that are not implemented already. Is that right? 2011/11/7 Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@co...<mailto:it...@co...>> Thats going to take a while, unfortunately. LPP is already available on github, but we want to have some improvements made to its core before merging it to CLucene On Mon, Nov 7, 2011<tel:2011> at 4:01 PM, Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...<mailto:eme...@gm...>> wrote: Thank you Viet. When will this new version of CLucene be ready? Any idea? []'s Emerson de Lira Espínola 2011/11/5 Veit Jahns <nun...@go...<mailto:nun...@go...>> Hi Emerson! 2011/11/4 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...<mailto:eme...@gm...>> I'm willing to write the BrazillianAnalyzer. What should I do? Do you have an idea about how much time is needed to write it? 1 week? 2 weeks? 1 month? If the BrazillianAnalyzer from Java Lucene fits your needs, then the only thing you have to do is to port this Analyzer to CLucene. I did the same once for the GermanAnalyzer and I needed more or less a day. BTW, a while ago we started to work on a new code base for CLucene based on Lucene++. Lucene++ has already a BrazillianAnalyzer [1]. But it is based on a newer version of Java Lucene. Kind regards, Veit [1] https://github.com/luceneplusplus/LucenePlusPlus/tree/e28b15b02ff9de2208965e9af8eb80983380cdcd/src/contrib/analyzers/common/analysis/br ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012<tel:2012> Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ CLucene-developers mailing list CLu...@li...<mailto:CLu...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012<tel:2012> Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ CLucene-developers mailing list CLu...@li...<mailto:CLu...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012<tel:2012> Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ CLucene-developers mailing list CLu...@li...<mailto:CLu...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012<tel:2012> Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ CLucene-developers mailing list CLu...@li...<mailto:CLu...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ CLucene-developers mailing list CLu...@li...<mailto:CLu...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers |
|
From: Emerson E. <eme...@gm...> - 2011-11-07 14:28:11
|
Thank you. []'s Emerson de Lira Espínola ** <eme...@gm...> <https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola> <http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com> <http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> 2011/11/7 Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@co...> > Yeah, shouldn't be too hard to pull off > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Emerson Espínola < > eme...@gm...> wrote: > >> So the better way for me would be porting BrazillianAnalyzer from Lucene, >> wouldn't it? Because if I use the [1] I'll probably have problems because >> it depends on something (.h files) that are not implemented already. Is >> that right? >> >> >> []'s >> Emerson de Lira Espínola >> ** <eme...@gm...> >> <https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> >> <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola> >> <http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> >> <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com> >> <http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> >> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> >> >> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> >> >> >> 2011/11/7 Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@co...> >> >>> Thats going to take a while, unfortunately. LPP is already available on >>> github, but we want to have some improvements made to its core before >>> merging it to CLucene >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Emerson Espínola < >>> eme...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>>> Thank you Viet. >>>> >>>> When will this new version of CLucene be ready? Any idea? >>>> >>>> >>>> []'s >>>> Emerson de Lira Espínola >>>> ** <eme...@gm...> >>>> <https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> >>>> <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> >>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola> >>>> <http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> >>>> <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com> >>>> <http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> >>>> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> >>>> >>>> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2011/11/5 Veit Jahns <nun...@go...> >>>> >>>>> Hi Emerson! >>>>> >>>>> 2011/11/4 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm willing to write the BrazillianAnalyzer. What should I do? Do you >>>>>> have an idea about how much time is needed to write it? 1 week? 2 weeks? 1 >>>>>> month? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If the BrazillianAnalyzer from Java Lucene fits your needs, then the >>>>> only thing you have to do is to port this Analyzer to CLucene. I did the >>>>> same once for the GermanAnalyzer and I needed more or less a day. >>>>> >>>>> BTW, a while ago we started to work on a new code base for CLucene >>>>> based on Lucene++. Lucene++ has already a BrazillianAnalyzer [1]. But it is >>>>> based on a newer version of Java Lucene. >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards, >>>>> >>>>> Veit >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> https://github.com/luceneplusplus/LucenePlusPlus/tree/e28b15b02ff9de2208965e9af8eb80983380cdcd/src/contrib/analyzers/common/analysis/br >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >>>>> Save $700 by Nov 18 >>>>> Register now >>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> CLucene-developers mailing list >>>>> CLu...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >>>> Save $700 by Nov 18 >>>> Register now >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CLucene-developers mailing list >>>> CLu...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >>> Save $700 by Nov 18 >>> Register now >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CLucene-developers mailing list >>> CLu...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >> Save $700 by Nov 18 >> Register now >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >> _______________________________________________ >> CLucene-developers mailing list >> CLu...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > |
|
From: Itamar Syn-H. <it...@co...> - 2011-11-07 14:23:54
|
Yeah, shouldn't be too hard to pull off On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...>wrote: > So the better way for me would be porting BrazillianAnalyzer from Lucene, > wouldn't it? Because if I use the [1] I'll probably have problems because > it depends on something (.h files) that are not implemented already. Is > that right? > > > []'s > Emerson de Lira Espínola > ** <eme...@gm...> > <https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> > <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola> > <http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> > <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com> <http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> > <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> > > <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> > > > 2011/11/7 Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@co...> > >> Thats going to take a while, unfortunately. LPP is already available on >> github, but we want to have some improvements made to its core before >> merging it to CLucene >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Emerson Espínola < >> eme...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> Thank you Viet. >>> >>> When will this new version of CLucene be ready? Any idea? >>> >>> >>> []'s >>> Emerson de Lira Espínola >>> ** <eme...@gm...> >>> <https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> >>> <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> >>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola> >>> <http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> >>> <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com> >>> <http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> >>> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> >>> >>> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> >>> >>> >>> 2011/11/5 Veit Jahns <nun...@go...> >>> >>>> Hi Emerson! >>>> >>>> 2011/11/4 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm willing to write the BrazillianAnalyzer. What should I do? Do you >>>>> have an idea about how much time is needed to write it? 1 week? 2 weeks? 1 >>>>> month? >>>>> >>>> >>>> If the BrazillianAnalyzer from Java Lucene fits your needs, then the >>>> only thing you have to do is to port this Analyzer to CLucene. I did the >>>> same once for the GermanAnalyzer and I needed more or less a day. >>>> >>>> BTW, a while ago we started to work on a new code base for CLucene >>>> based on Lucene++. Lucene++ has already a BrazillianAnalyzer [1]. But it is >>>> based on a newer version of Java Lucene. >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> >>>> Veit >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> https://github.com/luceneplusplus/LucenePlusPlus/tree/e28b15b02ff9de2208965e9af8eb80983380cdcd/src/contrib/analyzers/common/analysis/br >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >>>> Save $700 by Nov 18 >>>> Register now >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CLucene-developers mailing list >>>> CLu...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >>> Save $700 by Nov 18 >>> Register now >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CLucene-developers mailing list >>> CLu...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >> Save $700 by Nov 18 >> Register now >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >> _______________________________________________ >> CLucene-developers mailing list >> CLu...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > |
|
From: Emerson E. <eme...@gm...> - 2011-11-07 14:17:50
|
So the better way for me would be porting BrazillianAnalyzer from Lucene, wouldn't it? Because if I use the [1] I'll probably have problems because it depends on something (.h files) that are not implemented already. Is that right? []'s Emerson de Lira Espínola ** <eme...@gm...> <https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola> <http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com> <http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> 2011/11/7 Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@co...> > Thats going to take a while, unfortunately. LPP is already available on > github, but we want to have some improvements made to its core before > merging it to CLucene > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Emerson Espínola < > eme...@gm...> wrote: > >> Thank you Viet. >> >> When will this new version of CLucene be ready? Any idea? >> >> >> []'s >> Emerson de Lira Espínola >> ** <eme...@gm...> >> <https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> >> <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola> >> <http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> >> <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com> >> <http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> >> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> >> >> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> >> >> >> 2011/11/5 Veit Jahns <nun...@go...> >> >>> Hi Emerson! >>> >>> 2011/11/4 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...> >>> >>>> >>>> I'm willing to write the BrazillianAnalyzer. What should I do? Do you >>>> have an idea about how much time is needed to write it? 1 week? 2 weeks? 1 >>>> month? >>>> >>> >>> If the BrazillianAnalyzer from Java Lucene fits your needs, then the >>> only thing you have to do is to port this Analyzer to CLucene. I did the >>> same once for the GermanAnalyzer and I needed more or less a day. >>> >>> BTW, a while ago we started to work on a new code base for CLucene based >>> on Lucene++. Lucene++ has already a BrazillianAnalyzer [1]. But it is based >>> on a newer version of Java Lucene. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Veit >>> >>> [1] >>> https://github.com/luceneplusplus/LucenePlusPlus/tree/e28b15b02ff9de2208965e9af8eb80983380cdcd/src/contrib/analyzers/common/analysis/br >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >>> Save $700 by Nov 18 >>> Register now >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CLucene-developers mailing list >>> CLu...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >> Save $700 by Nov 18 >> Register now >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >> _______________________________________________ >> CLucene-developers mailing list >> CLu...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > |
|
From: Itamar Syn-H. <it...@co...> - 2011-11-07 14:12:27
|
Thats going to take a while, unfortunately. LPP is already available on github, but we want to have some improvements made to its core before merging it to CLucene On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...>wrote: > Thank you Viet. > > When will this new version of CLucene be ready? Any idea? > > > []'s > Emerson de Lira Espínola > ** <eme...@gm...> > <https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> > <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola> > <http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> > <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com> <http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> > <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> > > <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> > > > 2011/11/5 Veit Jahns <nun...@go...> > >> Hi Emerson! >> >> 2011/11/4 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...> >> >>> >>> I'm willing to write the BrazillianAnalyzer. What should I do? Do you >>> have an idea about how much time is needed to write it? 1 week? 2 weeks? 1 >>> month? >>> >> >> If the BrazillianAnalyzer from Java Lucene fits your needs, then the only >> thing you have to do is to port this Analyzer to CLucene. I did the same >> once for the GermanAnalyzer and I needed more or less a day. >> >> BTW, a while ago we started to work on a new code base for CLucene based >> on Lucene++. Lucene++ has already a BrazillianAnalyzer [1]. But it is based >> on a newer version of Java Lucene. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Veit >> >> [1] >> https://github.com/luceneplusplus/LucenePlusPlus/tree/e28b15b02ff9de2208965e9af8eb80983380cdcd/src/contrib/analyzers/common/analysis/br >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> RSA(R) Conference 2012 >> Save $700 by Nov 18 >> Register now >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CLucene-developers mailing list >> CLu...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > |
|
From: Emerson E. <eme...@gm...> - 2011-11-07 14:02:09
|
Thank you Viet. When will this new version of CLucene be ready? Any idea? []'s Emerson de Lira Espínola ** <eme...@gm...> <https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola> <http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com> <http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> 2011/11/5 Veit Jahns <nun...@go...> > Hi Emerson! > > 2011/11/4 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...> > >> >> I'm willing to write the BrazillianAnalyzer. What should I do? Do you >> have an idea about how much time is needed to write it? 1 week? 2 weeks? 1 >> month? >> > > If the BrazillianAnalyzer from Java Lucene fits your needs, then the only > thing you have to do is to port this Analyzer to CLucene. I did the same > once for the GermanAnalyzer and I needed more or less a day. > > BTW, a while ago we started to work on a new code base for CLucene based > on Lucene++. Lucene++ has already a BrazillianAnalyzer [1]. But it is based > on a newer version of Java Lucene. > > Kind regards, > > Veit > > [1] > https://github.com/luceneplusplus/LucenePlusPlus/tree/e28b15b02ff9de2208965e9af8eb80983380cdcd/src/contrib/analyzers/common/analysis/br > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > |
|
From: Veit J. <nun...@go...> - 2011-11-05 15:06:01
|
Hi Albin, what difficulties did you had with compiling CLucene on iOS? Kind regards, Veit 2011/10/29 Albin Stigö <alb...@gm...>: > Hi Veit, > > I had some difficulties compiling and wrapping my head around the > build system and in the end I settled for hyper estraier which I > managed to cross compile. I was also really surprised how fast hyper > estraier was. > > --Albin > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Veit Jahns <nun...@go...> wrote: >> Hi Albin! >> >> 2011/10/20 Albin Stigö <alb...@gm...>: >>> I wonder if anyone could give me some pointers on how to build clucene >>> as a static library for iOS? >> >> I'm not familiar with iOS and never tried to build CLucene on iOS. But >> think it is possible by using CMake and CLang (somehow). Have you >> tried it yet? >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Veit >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the >> demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. >> Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn >> about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> CLucene-developers mailing list >> CLu...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Get your Android app more play: Bring it to the BlackBerry PlayBook > in minutes. BlackBerry App World™ now supports Android™ Apps > for the BlackBerry® PlayBook™. Discover just how easy and simple > it is! http://p.sf.net/sfu/android-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > |
|
From: Veit J. <nun...@go...> - 2011-11-05 15:04:04
|
Hi Emerson! 2011/11/4 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...> > > I'm willing to write the BrazillianAnalyzer. What should I do? Do you have > an idea about how much time is needed to write it? 1 week? 2 weeks? 1 month? > If the BrazillianAnalyzer from Java Lucene fits your needs, then the only thing you have to do is to port this Analyzer to CLucene. I did the same once for the GermanAnalyzer and I needed more or less a day. BTW, a while ago we started to work on a new code base for CLucene based on Lucene++. Lucene++ has already a BrazillianAnalyzer [1]. But it is based on a newer version of Java Lucene. Kind regards, Veit [1] https://github.com/luceneplusplus/LucenePlusPlus/tree/e28b15b02ff9de2208965e9af8eb80983380cdcd/src/contrib/analyzers/common/analysis/br |
|
From: Emerson E. <eme...@gm...> - 2011-11-04 16:15:36
|
Hi Veit. Long time no seen. I was thinking that I'll really need a BrazillianAnalyzer in my application. You told me that you could give me support for this work. I'm willing to write the BrazillianAnalyzer. What should I do? Do you have an idea about how much time is needed to write it? 1 week? 2 weeks? 1 month? Thanks in advance. []'s Emerson de Lira Espínola ** <eme...@gm...> <https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola> <http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com> <http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> 2011/5/27 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...> > Terrific. Thanks a lot. > > > []'s > Emerson de Lira Espínola > ** <eme...@gm...> > <https://profiles.google.com/emersonespinola/buzz?hl=pt-BR> > <http://www.quora.com/emersonespinola> <http://www.facebook.com/emersonespinola> > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/emersonespinola> > <http://spaces.live.com/profile.aspx?mem=eme...@ho...> > <http://emersonespinola.blogspot.com> <http://twitter.com/emersonespinola> > <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> > > <http://www.myebook.com/emersonespinola/> > > > 2011/5/27 Veit Jahns <nun...@go...> > >> Hi Emerson! >> >> 2011/5/27 Emerson Espínola <eme...@gm...> >> > >> > Hi Veit. >> > >> > Thank yo very much for your answer. Great explanation. You don't wonder >> how much you're helping me. >> >> You are welcome! >> >> > 1. I'll try english documents. >> > 2. Ok. >> > 3. Does BrazilianAnalyzer work similar to StandardAnalyzer? If so, >> that's what I want. I'm from Brazil. :) There are no much differences >> between portuguese from Portugal and portuguese from Brazil. But if there >> is already an analyzer for portuguese from Brazil that's perfect for me. >> >> According to the source code, it is based on the StandardAnalyzer. It >> uses the StandardTokenizer and the StandardFilter, and adds a stopword >> filter and a brazilian stemming filter. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Veit >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. >> With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, >> you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. >> Download your free trial now. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 >> _______________________________________________ >> CLucene-developers mailing list >> CLu...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >> > > |
|
From: Albin S. <alb...@gm...> - 2011-10-29 07:42:01
|
Hi Veit, I had some difficulties compiling and wrapping my head around the build system and in the end I settled for hyper estraier which I managed to cross compile. I was also really surprised how fast hyper estraier was. --Albin On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Veit Jahns <nun...@go...> wrote: > Hi Albin! > > 2011/10/20 Albin Stigö <alb...@gm...>: >> I wonder if anyone could give me some pointers on how to build clucene >> as a static library for iOS? > > I'm not familiar with iOS and never tried to build CLucene on iOS. But > think it is possible by using CMake and CLang (somehow). Have you > tried it yet? > > Kind regards, > > Veit > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the > demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. > Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn > about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > |
|
From: Veit J. <nun...@go...> - 2011-10-28 19:52:02
|
Hi Albin! 2011/10/20 Albin Stigö <alb...@gm...>: > I wonder if anyone could give me some pointers on how to build clucene > as a static library for iOS? I'm not familiar with iOS and never tried to build CLucene on iOS. But think it is possible by using CMake and CLang (somehow). Have you tried it yet? Kind regards, Veit |
|
From: Veit J. <nun...@go...> - 2011-10-28 19:47:52
|
Hi Celto,
I'm sorry. I was distracted by other things from your e-mail.
2011/10/17 cel tix44 <cel...@gm...>:
> Veit
> A couple of minor problems in the latest update ---
> 1) When generating code, CMAKE throws this error:
> CMake Error at src/core/CMakeLists.txt:194 (add_library):
> Cannot find source file:
> ./CLucene/util/workaround/vc6/operators.cpp
> This is because the WORKAROUND folder sits under CLUCENE, not under UTIL.
> To fix, open src/core/CMakeLists.txt and remove UTIL\ from line 178 and 179,
> so that they read:
> IF (${MSVC_VERSION} EQUAL "1200")
> SET(clucene_workaround_Files ./CLucene/workaround/vc6/operators.cpp)
> SET(HEADERS_workaround ./CLucene/workaround/vc6/operators.h)
> ENDIF ()
Done.
> 2) SegmentInfos.cpp compiles with these errors:
> D:\cl_2334_git_master\src\core\CLucene/workaround/vc6/operators.h(12) :
> error C2653: 'std' : is not a class or namespace name
> D:\cl_2334_git_master\src\core\CLucene/workaround/vc6/operators.h(12) :
> error C2143: syntax error : missing ';' before '&'
> ...etc.
> To fix, open operators.h and add #include <iostream> above std::ostream&, so
> that the file reads:
> #include <iostream>
> std::ostream& operator << (std::ostream& os, __int64 i);
> With these corrections, CORE & SHARED compile okay.
Done.
> 3) A question re: _lucene_workaround_vc6_DocumentsWriter_ in operators.h,
> please -- the file currently reads:
> #ifndef _lucene_workaround_vc6_DocumentsWriter_
> .... implement the fix for vc6
> #endif
> In which situation would _lucene_workaround_vc6_DocumentsWriter_ need to be
> defined to get the fix for vc6 suppressed ?
This should be a guard macro, but forgot the #define. Thanks for
pointing these errors out. I hope everything works now with VC6.
Kind regards,
Veit
|
|
From: Albin S. <alb...@gm...> - 2011-10-20 17:21:32
|
I wonder if anyone could give me some pointers on how to build clucene as a static library for iOS? Thanks, Albin |
|
From: cel t. <cel...@gm...> - 2011-10-16 22:02:55
|
Veit
A couple of minor problems in the latest update ---
1) When generating code, CMAKE throws this error:
CMake Error at src/core/CMakeLists.txt:194 (add_library):
Cannot find source file:
./CLucene/util/workaround/vc6/operators.cpp
This is because the WORKAROUND folder sits under CLUCENE, not under UTIL.
To fix, open src/core/CMakeLists.txt and remove UTIL\ from line 178 and 179,
so that they read:
IF (${MSVC_VERSION} EQUAL "1200")
SET(clucene_workaround_Files ./CLucene/workaround/vc6/operators.cpp)
SET(HEADERS_workaround ./CLucene/workaround/vc6/operators.h)
ENDIF ()
2) SegmentInfos.cpp compiles with these errors:
D:\cl_2334_git_master\src\core\CLucene/workaround/vc6/operators.h(12) :
error C2653: 'std' : is not a class or namespace name
D:\cl_2334_git_master\src\core\CLucene/workaround/vc6/operators.h(12) :
error C2143: syntax error : missing ';' before '&'
...etc.
To fix, open operators.h and add #include <iostream> above std::ostream&, so
that the file reads:
#include <iostream>
std::ostream& operator << (std::ostream& os, __int64 i);
With these corrections, CORE & SHARED compile okay.
3) A question re: _lucene_workaround_vc6_DocumentsWriter_ in operators.h,
please -- the file currently reads:
#ifndef _lucene_workaround_vc6_DocumentsWriter_
.... implement the fix for vc6
#endif
In which situation would _lucene_workaround_vc6_DocumentsWriter_ need to be
defined to get the fix for vc6 suppressed ?
Regards
Celto
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Veit Jahns <nun...@go...>wrote:
> 2011/10/10 Veit Jahns <nun...@go...>:
> >> Microsoft suggests this:
> >> #ifdef _MSC_VER
> >> #if _MSC_VER == 1200
> >> std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, __int64 i ) // borrowed from
> >> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/168440
> >> {
> >> char buf[20];
> >> sprintf(buf,"%I64d", i );
> >> os << buf;
> >> return os;
> >> }
> >> #endif
> >> #endif
> >> With either of the 2 fixes above, both CLUCENE_CORE and CLUCENE_SHARED
> >> compile okay.
> >
> > I will then integrate the later one.
>
> Added this workaround to th vc6-branch.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Veit Jahns
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
> definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
> _______________________________________________
> CLucene-developers mailing list
> CLu...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers
>
|
53 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
