Menu
▾
▴
clucene-developers — CLucene development-related discussion.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(56) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(62) |
Oct
(71) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
|
Apr
(62) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(81) |
Dec
(41) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(70) |
Feb
(51) |
Mar
(46) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(54) |
Dec
(68) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(43) |
Mar
(64) |
Apr
(141) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(101) |
Jul
(112) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(85) |
Oct
(63) |
Nov
(84) |
Dec
(81) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(64) |
Mar
(46) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(34) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(25) |
Nov
(12) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(18) |
Jun
(47) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(61) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(79) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(48) |
Feb
(50) |
Mar
(28) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(51) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(125) |
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(38) |
Oct
(29) |
Nov
(58) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(81) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(82) |
Sep
(84) |
Oct
(35) |
Nov
(43) |
Dec
(26) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(59) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(10) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(8) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2025 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Ben v. K. <ust...@us...> - 2003-11-04 06:32:13
|
Update of /cvsroot/clucene/build/gcc In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv31601/build/gcc Modified Files: build Log Message: |
|
From: Ben v. K. <ust...@us...> - 2003-11-04 06:32:13
|
Update of /cvsroot/clucene/build/Dev-CPP In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv31601/build/Dev-CPP Modified Files: CLucene.dev Log Message: |
|
From: <am...@ma...> - 2003-10-25 18:18:19
|
I sent you the latest php extension and modified wrapper with the cltest.php. (the one that uses resources). Should I send that again? -pedja ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mr Benjamin van Klinken" <s40...@st...> To: <clu...@li...> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 3:31 AM Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] something is broken... > Could you send me the new php code and the cltest.php files? Might be something with that? > > ben > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. > Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open > Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new > features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > |
|
From: Mr B. v. K. <s40...@st...> - 2003-10-25 17:19:29
|
Could you send me the new php code and the cltest.php files? Might be something with that? ben |
|
From: <am...@ma...> - 2003-10-25 05:37:35
|
The only way I could try to execute windows apps is under Wine(X) but not sure how good would that be in this case... Anyways, could you please tell me what has been change in CLucene when you added the resources, namely for indexing or searching so I have some starting point where to look for any issues. As I said before things work great with Rob's patches and then you made some changes and now these hits and searches dont come up... thanks -pedja ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ben van Klinken" <be...@vi...> To: <clu...@li...> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 1:54 AM Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] something is broken... > Ahh, ok :) > > Is there something in linux for interopability between different languages - > like dll's? > > Ben > > On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 20:42:57 -0400, <am...@ma...> wrote: > > > I'm running Linux here Ben, I cant compile dll's for windows :) > > > > > > -pedja > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ben van Klinken" <s40...@st...> > > To: <clu...@li...> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 6:49 PM > > Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] something is broken... > > > > > >> Have you tried running the test program inside the dll/test directory? > >> THat works fine for me (i think). > >> > >> ben > >> > >> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 19:54:16 -0400, <am...@ma...> wrote: > >> > >> > ...I dont know what but ever since this Resource business things dont > >> > seem > >> > to work the way they should/used to using the wrapper/php ext. > >> > > >> > Instead of error messages I get garbage; hit count shows 0 hits yet it > >> > finds > >> > one > >> > document, even though there should be more than one hit/documents > >> found. > >> > > >> > I'm really puzzled here because there's nothing to it, using this > >> > Resource > >> > struct > >> > just makes it look more organized but where are the correct results > >> from > >> > all > >> > this? > >> > What has been changed inside CLucene core / if anything? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -pedja > >> > > >> > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > From: <am...@ma...> > >> > To: <clu...@li...> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:46 PM > >> > Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] some more fixes > >> > > >> > > >> >> Hi Ben > >> >> > >> >> Thanks for all the recent updates, I wonder what's the next step with > >> >> CLucene. > >> >> Personally I'd like to see MFQP (multifieldqueryparser) implemented, > > but > >> >> then > >> >> again I admit I kinda need it myself so I'm selfish. :) > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > I've replaced the stringDuplicate function with a function that > >> > allocates > >> >> > memory using new[] then doing a stringCopy. So I think there > > shouldn't > >> > be > >> >> > any code that uses malloc anymore. However i ran a quick comparison > >> > check > >> >> > using the tests program, comparing the old code that uses malloc > >> >> against > >> >> > the new code that uses new[]. The old codes seems to be the > >> slightest > >> > big > >> >> > faster. Does anyone know about if if there's any performance issues > > of > >> >> > malloc vs new[]? > >> >> > >> >> I thought that strcpy does malloc internally or something, no? > >> >> When I tried using strcpy in the php extensions I'd get core dumps, > >> so > >> > when > >> >> I switched to strdup instead of strcpy things seemed to work ok. > >> >> If new[] is going to be used as standard then I might as well change > > all > >> >> the strdup's to strcpy with new[].... > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > I've posted 0.8.3 on sourceforge. Sorry about CVS, does anyone have > >> >> any > >> >> > ideas how to get through a firewall onto sourceforge (no socks > >> server > >> >> > either)? > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> Aside from opening a firewall port the only thing that comes to mind > >> is > >> >> to > >> >> use > >> >> a bouncer/port forwarder that will forward connections from some open > >> >> port > >> >> on your internal network to an outside port for cvs. > >> >> CVS port is 2401 tcp/udp > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -pedja > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations > >> >> Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge > >> >> We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win > > $100 > >> >> http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> CLucene-developers mailing list > >> >> CLu...@li... > >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------- > >> > This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations > >> > Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge > >> > We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win > >> $100 > >> > http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > CLucene-developers mailing list > >> > CLu...@li... > >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > >> This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations > >> Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge > >> We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 > >> http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 > >> _______________________________________________ > >> CLucene-developers mailing list > >> CLu...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > >> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations > > Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge > > We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 > > http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 > > _______________________________________________ > > CLucene-developers mailing list > > CLu...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. > Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open > Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new > features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > |
|
From: <am...@ma...> - 2003-10-25 00:35:11
|
Alrighty...check your email :) -pedja ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ben van Klinken" <be...@vi...> To: <clu...@li...> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 7:35 PM Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] 0.8.6 > Could you send me through a copy of what you have tried so far? > > ben > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <am...@ma...> > To: <clu...@li...> > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 1:29 AM > Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] 0.8.6 > > > > Wonderful news Ben !! > > > > Thanks for taking the time to implement MFQP, I cant wait to try that out. > > > > I still need to sort this PHP issue where results/hits dont show and also > > now I noticed some lag for example if I click Optimize in cltest.php > > sometimes > > it takes long time to execute, or if you do Index to create a new document > > the first time you do it, it's lagging for a minute or two and then fails > to > > add > > but says it did add a document?! > > This did not use to happen prior to adding resources or whatever other > > changes > > have been made after Rob did his patch (with Rob's patch on the old > version > > it works just fine) > > > > On this side there's really nothing to php_clucene.c, I've just added an > > extra > > long paremeter infront of most functions to include the resource integer, > > and on the clucene.cpp wrapper I've added ifdefs wherever there's a call > > to a _UNICODE function, so for example instead of: > > > > wchar_t* wfield = Misc::charToWide(field); > > > > I just do a quick hack: > > > > char_t* wfield = strdup(field); > > > > Now this works fine, or at least it used to be fine in the prior versions > > before > > the resource business, and now I'm not sure if this is correct anymore, > but > > it > > does work even with resources (which shouldnt really make a difference) > > > > Any insight would be appreciated... > > > > > > -pedja > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ben van Klinken" <s40...@st...> > > To: <clu...@li...> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 11:04 PM > > Subject: [CLucene-dev] 0.8.6 > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > New release up. Sorry, not on CVS yet. > > > Changes were > > > * implemented MultiSearch and MultiFieldQueryParser > > > > > > few other minor changes. > > > > > > cheers, > > > ben > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations > > > Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge > > > We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 > > > http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > CLucene-developers mailing list > > > CLu...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. > > Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open > > Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new > > features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > > _______________________________________________ > > CLucene-developers mailing list > > CLu...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. > Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open > Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new > features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > |
|
From: Ben v. K. <be...@vi...> - 2003-10-24 23:35:41
|
Probably better to use the stringDuplicate macro. It uses new[] to allocate.
Better yet, do:
#ifdef _UNICODE
wchar_t* wfield = Misc::charToWide(field);
....
delete[] wfield;
#else
char_t* wfield = field;
....
//no free!
#endif
Unicode needs to copy, only because it needs to convert.
ben
----- Original Message -----
From: <am...@ma...>
To: <clu...@li...>
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 5:23 AM
Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] 0.8.6
> Thanks Rob, I know, that's why I also have:
>
> #ifdef _UNICODE
> wchar_t* wfield = Misc::charToWide(field);
> ....
> delete[] wfield;
> #else
> char_t* wfield = strdup(field);
> ....
> free(wfield)
> #endif
>
>
> -pedja
>
>
> >
> > I'm not sure everything that's going on here because I haven't read up
> > on what these resources are or looked at how we do them.
> >
> > But you should note that Misc::charToWide(const char* s) allocates a
> > new string with new[], and the call to strdup() allocates one with
> > malloc(), which could cause problems later on in the processing.
> >
> > --Rob
> >
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
> Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
> Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new
> features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> CLucene-developers mailing list
> CLu...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers
>
|
|
From: Ben v. K. <be...@vi...> - 2003-10-24 23:35:41
|
Could you send me through a copy of what you have tried so far? ben ----- Original Message ----- From: <am...@ma...> To: <clu...@li...> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 1:29 AM Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] 0.8.6 > Wonderful news Ben !! > > Thanks for taking the time to implement MFQP, I cant wait to try that out. > > I still need to sort this PHP issue where results/hits dont show and also > now I noticed some lag for example if I click Optimize in cltest.php > sometimes > it takes long time to execute, or if you do Index to create a new document > the first time you do it, it's lagging for a minute or two and then fails to > add > but says it did add a document?! > This did not use to happen prior to adding resources or whatever other > changes > have been made after Rob did his patch (with Rob's patch on the old version > it works just fine) > > On this side there's really nothing to php_clucene.c, I've just added an > extra > long paremeter infront of most functions to include the resource integer, > and on the clucene.cpp wrapper I've added ifdefs wherever there's a call > to a _UNICODE function, so for example instead of: > > wchar_t* wfield = Misc::charToWide(field); > > I just do a quick hack: > > char_t* wfield = strdup(field); > > Now this works fine, or at least it used to be fine in the prior versions > before > the resource business, and now I'm not sure if this is correct anymore, but > it > does work even with resources (which shouldnt really make a difference) > > Any insight would be appreciated... > > > -pedja > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ben van Klinken" <s40...@st...> > To: <clu...@li...> > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 11:04 PM > Subject: [CLucene-dev] 0.8.6 > > > > Hi, > > > > New release up. Sorry, not on CVS yet. > > Changes were > > * implemented MultiSearch and MultiFieldQueryParser > > > > few other minor changes. > > > > cheers, > > ben > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations > > Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge > > We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 > > http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 > > _______________________________________________ > > CLucene-developers mailing list > > CLu...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. > Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open > Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new > features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > |
|
From: <am...@ma...> - 2003-10-24 21:49:24
|
Ben, This is what I've done - I used my old php extension and wrapper, the one before this resources business and 0.8.6 works just fine it seems. I do not see any lag, nor i see problems searching or indexing and hits come up the way they should. The only thing that doesnt work are messages (error and normal) that come out as gibberish (as if the errstr is actually a pointer and not the string itself...) So, please if you have a moment, check all this resource stuff you've added to the wrapper because it is a "show stopper" on Linux, or maybe consider doing this in some other way or not doing it at all :) I'll wait for your reply about this matter, and whether there'll be a new version including the wrapper coming soon (with the MFQP added to the wrapper or could I do it myself)? thanks -pedja |
|
From: <am...@ma...> - 2003-10-24 19:28:59
|
Thanks Rob, I know, that's why I also have: #ifdef _UNICODE wchar_t* wfield = Misc::charToWide(field); .... delete[] wfield; #else char_t* wfield = strdup(field); .... free(wfield) #endif -pedja > > I'm not sure everything that's going on here because I haven't read up > on what these resources are or looked at how we do them. > > But you should note that Misc::charToWide(const char* s) allocates a > new string with new[], and the call to strdup() allocates one with > malloc(), which could cause problems later on in the processing. > > --Rob > |
|
From: <rg...@sd...> - 2003-10-24 18:47:29
|
>>>>> "amigo" == amigo <am...@ma...> writes: amigo> amigo> Wonderful news Ben !! amigo> Thanks for taking the time to implement MFQP, I cant wait to amigo> try that out. amigo> amigo> I still need to sort this PHP issue where results/hits dont amigo> show and also now I noticed some lag for example if I click amigo> Optimize in cltest.php sometimes it takes long time to execute, amigo> or if you do Index to create a new document the first time you amigo> do it, it's lagging for a minute or two and then fails to add amigo> but says it did add a document?! amigo> This did not use to happen prior to adding resources or amigo> whatever other changes have been made after Rob did his patch amigo> (with Rob's patch on the old version it works just fine) amigo> amigo> On this side there's really nothing to php_clucene.c, I've just amigo> added an extra long paremeter infront of most functions to amigo> include the resource integer, and on the clucene.cpp wrapper amigo> I've added ifdefs wherever there's a call to a _UNICODE amigo> function, so for example instead of: amigo> amigo> wchar_t* wfield = Misc::charToWide(field); amigo> amigo> I just do a quick hack: amigo> amigo> char_t* wfield = strdup(field); amigo> amigo> Now this works fine, or at least it used to be fine in the amigo> prior versions before the resource business, and now I'm not amigo> sure if this is correct anymore, but it does work even with amigo> resources (which shouldnt really make a difference) amigo> amigo> Any insight would be appreciated... I'm not sure everything that's going on here because I haven't read up on what these resources are or looked at how we do them. But you should note that Misc::charToWide(const char* s) allocates a new string with new[], and the call to strdup() allocates one with malloc(), which could cause problems later on in the processing. --Rob |
|
From: <am...@ma...> - 2003-10-24 18:04:17
|
Wonderful news Ben !! Thanks for taking the time to implement MFQP, I cant wait to try that out. I still need to sort this PHP issue where results/hits dont show and also now I noticed some lag for example if I click Optimize in cltest.php sometimes it takes long time to execute, or if you do Index to create a new document the first time you do it, it's lagging for a minute or two and then fails to add but says it did add a document?! This did not use to happen prior to adding resources or whatever other changes have been made after Rob did his patch (with Rob's patch on the old version it works just fine) On this side there's really nothing to php_clucene.c, I've just added an extra long paremeter infront of most functions to include the resource integer, and on the clucene.cpp wrapper I've added ifdefs wherever there's a call to a _UNICODE function, so for example instead of: wchar_t* wfield = Misc::charToWide(field); I just do a quick hack: char_t* wfield = strdup(field); Now this works fine, or at least it used to be fine in the prior versions before the resource business, and now I'm not sure if this is correct anymore, but it does work even with resources (which shouldnt really make a difference) Any insight would be appreciated... -pedja ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ben van Klinken" <s40...@st...> To: <clu...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 11:04 PM Subject: [CLucene-dev] 0.8.6 > Hi, > > New release up. Sorry, not on CVS yet. > Changes were > * implemented MultiSearch and MultiFieldQueryParser > > few other minor changes. > > cheers, > ben > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations > Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge > We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 > http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > |
|
From: Ben v. K. <be...@vi...> - 2003-10-24 13:06:46
|
Ahh, ok :) Is there something in linux for interopability between different languages - like dll's? Ben On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 20:42:57 -0400, <am...@ma...> wrote: > I'm running Linux here Ben, I cant compile dll's for windows :) > > > -pedja > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ben van Klinken" <s40...@st...> > To: <clu...@li...> > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 6:49 PM > Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] something is broken... > > >> Have you tried running the test program inside the dll/test directory? >> THat works fine for me (i think). >> >> ben >> >> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 19:54:16 -0400, <am...@ma...> wrote: >> >> > ...I dont know what but ever since this Resource business things dont >> > seem >> > to work the way they should/used to using the wrapper/php ext. >> > >> > Instead of error messages I get garbage; hit count shows 0 hits yet it >> > finds >> > one >> > document, even though there should be more than one hit/documents >> found. >> > >> > I'm really puzzled here because there's nothing to it, using this >> > Resource >> > struct >> > just makes it look more organized but where are the correct results >> from >> > all >> > this? >> > What has been changed inside CLucene core / if anything? >> > >> > >> > >> > -pedja >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: <am...@ma...> >> > To: <clu...@li...> >> > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:46 PM >> > Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] some more fixes >> > >> > >> >> Hi Ben >> >> >> >> Thanks for all the recent updates, I wonder what's the next step with >> >> CLucene. >> >> Personally I'd like to see MFQP (multifieldqueryparser) implemented, > but >> >> then >> >> again I admit I kinda need it myself so I'm selfish. :) >> >> >> >> > >> >> > I've replaced the stringDuplicate function with a function that >> > allocates >> >> > memory using new[] then doing a stringCopy. So I think there > shouldn't >> > be >> >> > any code that uses malloc anymore. However i ran a quick comparison >> > check >> >> > using the tests program, comparing the old code that uses malloc >> >> against >> >> > the new code that uses new[]. The old codes seems to be the >> slightest >> > big >> >> > faster. Does anyone know about if if there's any performance issues > of >> >> > malloc vs new[]? >> >> >> >> I thought that strcpy does malloc internally or something, no? >> >> When I tried using strcpy in the php extensions I'd get core dumps, >> so >> > when >> >> I switched to strdup instead of strcpy things seemed to work ok. >> >> If new[] is going to be used as standard then I might as well change > all >> >> the strdup's to strcpy with new[].... >> >> >> >> > >> >> > I've posted 0.8.3 on sourceforge. Sorry about CVS, does anyone have >> >> any >> >> > ideas how to get through a firewall onto sourceforge (no socks >> server >> >> > either)? >> >> > >> >> >> >> Aside from opening a firewall port the only thing that comes to mind >> is >> >> to >> >> use >> >> a bouncer/port forwarder that will forward connections from some open >> >> port >> >> on your internal network to an outside port for cvs. >> >> CVS port is 2401 tcp/udp >> >> >> >> >> >> -pedja >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> >> This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations >> >> Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge >> >> We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win > $100 >> >> http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> CLucene-developers mailing list >> >> CLu...@li... >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------- >> > This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations >> > Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge >> > We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win >> $100 >> > http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 >> > _______________________________________________ >> > CLucene-developers mailing list >> > CLu...@li... >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations >> Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge >> We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 >> http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 >> _______________________________________________ >> CLucene-developers mailing list >> CLu...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations > Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge > We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 > http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > |
|
From: Ben v. K. <s40...@st...> - 2003-10-24 09:58:42
|
Rob, That was my mistake. That was fixed just before 0.8.1, but i lost the changes when integrating your stuff.... grrr. thanks ben On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 18:37:11 -0400 (EDT), Max Khesin <ma...@to...> wrote: > as of the latest release > FSInputStream(const char_t*) > appears to be attempting to open files for > reading AND writing. The Java version does not. Is this a bug or did I > miss something? > thx, > max > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations > Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge > We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 > http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > |
|
From: <am...@ma...> - 2003-10-24 02:52:40
|
Ben, Here's a sample page where you can see the php extension (not) doing it's job ... http://home.eniac.org/clucene/cltest.php if you add the default values, and search back, it will find 0 docs yet display the document reference 01234 ...if you add more again it'll show 0 hits and yet show only one document even though there are more than one in the index.. optimizing and deleting seems to work ok, just searching i gather (unless indexing is also messed up) I do not believe this to be a php issue because all this worked fine in the previous version(s) (prior to Resources*) -pedja |
|
From: Ben v. K. <s40...@st...> - 2003-10-23 05:24:59
|
Hi, New release up. Sorry, not on CVS yet. Changes were * implemented MultiSearch and MultiFieldQueryParser few other minor changes. cheers, ben |
|
From: <am...@ma...> - 2003-10-23 04:09:21
|
I'm running Linux here Ben, I cant compile dll's for windows :) -pedja ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ben van Klinken" <s40...@st...> To: <clu...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 6:49 PM Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] something is broken... > Have you tried running the test program inside the dll/test directory? > THat works fine for me (i think). > > ben > > On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 19:54:16 -0400, <am...@ma...> wrote: > > > ...I dont know what but ever since this Resource business things dont > > seem > > to work the way they should/used to using the wrapper/php ext. > > > > Instead of error messages I get garbage; hit count shows 0 hits yet it > > finds > > one > > document, even though there should be more than one hit/documents found. > > > > I'm really puzzled here because there's nothing to it, using this > > Resource > > struct > > just makes it look more organized but where are the correct results from > > all > > this? > > What has been changed inside CLucene core / if anything? > > > > > > > > -pedja > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <am...@ma...> > > To: <clu...@li...> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:46 PM > > Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] some more fixes > > > > > >> Hi Ben > >> > >> Thanks for all the recent updates, I wonder what's the next step with > >> CLucene. > >> Personally I'd like to see MFQP (multifieldqueryparser) implemented, but > >> then > >> again I admit I kinda need it myself so I'm selfish. :) > >> > >> > > >> > I've replaced the stringDuplicate function with a function that > > allocates > >> > memory using new[] then doing a stringCopy. So I think there shouldn't > > be > >> > any code that uses malloc anymore. However i ran a quick comparison > > check > >> > using the tests program, comparing the old code that uses malloc > >> against > >> > the new code that uses new[]. The old codes seems to be the slightest > > big > >> > faster. Does anyone know about if if there's any performance issues of > >> > malloc vs new[]? > >> > >> I thought that strcpy does malloc internally or something, no? > >> When I tried using strcpy in the php extensions I'd get core dumps, so > > when > >> I switched to strdup instead of strcpy things seemed to work ok. > >> If new[] is going to be used as standard then I might as well change all > >> the strdup's to strcpy with new[].... > >> > >> > > >> > I've posted 0.8.3 on sourceforge. Sorry about CVS, does anyone have > >> any > >> > ideas how to get through a firewall onto sourceforge (no socks server > >> > either)? > >> > > >> > >> Aside from opening a firewall port the only thing that comes to mind is > >> to > >> use > >> a bouncer/port forwarder that will forward connections from some open > >> port > >> on your internal network to an outside port for cvs. > >> CVS port is 2401 tcp/udp > >> > >> > >> -pedja > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > >> This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations > >> Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge > >> We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 > >> http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 > >> _______________________________________________ > >> CLucene-developers mailing list > >> CLu...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > >> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations > > Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge > > We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 > > http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 > > _______________________________________________ > > CLucene-developers mailing list > > CLu...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations > Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge > We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 > http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > |
|
From: Ben v. K. <s40...@st...> - 2003-10-22 23:57:03
|
Have you tried running the test program inside the dll/test directory? THat works fine for me (i think). ben On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 19:54:16 -0400, <am...@ma...> wrote: > ...I dont know what but ever since this Resource business things dont > seem > to work the way they should/used to using the wrapper/php ext. > > Instead of error messages I get garbage; hit count shows 0 hits yet it > finds > one > document, even though there should be more than one hit/documents found. > > I'm really puzzled here because there's nothing to it, using this > Resource > struct > just makes it look more organized but where are the correct results from > all > this? > What has been changed inside CLucene core / if anything? > > > > -pedja > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <am...@ma...> > To: <clu...@li...> > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:46 PM > Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] some more fixes > > >> Hi Ben >> >> Thanks for all the recent updates, I wonder what's the next step with >> CLucene. >> Personally I'd like to see MFQP (multifieldqueryparser) implemented, but >> then >> again I admit I kinda need it myself so I'm selfish. :) >> >> > >> > I've replaced the stringDuplicate function with a function that > allocates >> > memory using new[] then doing a stringCopy. So I think there shouldn't > be >> > any code that uses malloc anymore. However i ran a quick comparison > check >> > using the tests program, comparing the old code that uses malloc >> against >> > the new code that uses new[]. The old codes seems to be the slightest > big >> > faster. Does anyone know about if if there's any performance issues of >> > malloc vs new[]? >> >> I thought that strcpy does malloc internally or something, no? >> When I tried using strcpy in the php extensions I'd get core dumps, so > when >> I switched to strdup instead of strcpy things seemed to work ok. >> If new[] is going to be used as standard then I might as well change all >> the strdup's to strcpy with new[].... >> >> > >> > I've posted 0.8.3 on sourceforge. Sorry about CVS, does anyone have >> any >> > ideas how to get through a firewall onto sourceforge (no socks server >> > either)? >> > >> >> Aside from opening a firewall port the only thing that comes to mind is >> to >> use >> a bouncer/port forwarder that will forward connections from some open >> port >> on your internal network to an outside port for cvs. >> CVS port is 2401 tcp/udp >> >> >> -pedja >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations >> Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge >> We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 >> http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 >> _______________________________________________ >> CLucene-developers mailing list >> CLu...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations > Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge > We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 > http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > > |
|
From: <rg...@sd...> - 2003-10-22 22:56:05
|
In src/CLucene/search/IndexSearcher.cpp, line 124, I changed the "delete totalHits;" to "delete[] totalHits;" However, with that one change, I am unable to produce any errors when running the demo program on the reuter's set. I am indexing a much larger set while running under valgrind now. Because valgrind is slower, it make take a day or more. --Rob |
|
From: Max K. <ma...@to...> - 2003-10-22 22:49:03
|
as of the latest release FSInputStream(const char_t*) appears to be attempting to open files for reading AND writing. The Java version does not. Is this a bug or did I miss something? thx, max |
|
From: <am...@ma...> - 2003-10-22 09:45:34
|
...I dont know what but ever since this Resource business things dont seem to work the way they should/used to using the wrapper/php ext. Instead of error messages I get garbage; hit count shows 0 hits yet it finds one document, even though there should be more than one hit/documents found. I'm really puzzled here because there's nothing to it, using this Resource struct just makes it look more organized but where are the correct results from all this? What has been changed inside CLucene core / if anything? -pedja ----- Original Message ----- From: <am...@ma...> To: <clu...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:46 PM Subject: Re: [CLucene-dev] some more fixes > Hi Ben > > Thanks for all the recent updates, I wonder what's the next step with > CLucene. > Personally I'd like to see MFQP (multifieldqueryparser) implemented, but > then > again I admit I kinda need it myself so I'm selfish. :) > > > > > I've replaced the stringDuplicate function with a function that allocates > > memory using new[] then doing a stringCopy. So I think there shouldn't be > > any code that uses malloc anymore. However i ran a quick comparison check > > using the tests program, comparing the old code that uses malloc against > > the new code that uses new[]. The old codes seems to be the slightest big > > faster. Does anyone know about if if there's any performance issues of > > malloc vs new[]? > > I thought that strcpy does malloc internally or something, no? > When I tried using strcpy in the php extensions I'd get core dumps, so when > I switched to strdup instead of strcpy things seemed to work ok. > If new[] is going to be used as standard then I might as well change all > the strdup's to strcpy with new[].... > > > > > I've posted 0.8.3 on sourceforge. Sorry about CVS, does anyone have any > > ideas how to get through a firewall onto sourceforge (no socks server > > either)? > > > > Aside from opening a firewall port the only thing that comes to mind is to > use > a bouncer/port forwarder that will forward connections from some open port > on your internal network to an outside port for cvs. > CVS port is 2401 tcp/udp > > > -pedja > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations > Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge > We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 > http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54 > _______________________________________________ > CLucene-developers mailing list > CLu...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clucene-developers > |
|
From: <am...@ma...> - 2003-10-21 22:04:36
|
Hi Ben Thanks for all the recent updates, I wonder what's the next step with CLucene. Personally I'd like to see MFQP (multifieldqueryparser) implemented, but then again I admit I kinda need it myself so I'm selfish. :) > > I've replaced the stringDuplicate function with a function that allocates > memory using new[] then doing a stringCopy. So I think there shouldn't be > any code that uses malloc anymore. However i ran a quick comparison check > using the tests program, comparing the old code that uses malloc against > the new code that uses new[]. The old codes seems to be the slightest big > faster. Does anyone know about if if there's any performance issues of > malloc vs new[]? I thought that strcpy does malloc internally or something, no? When I tried using strcpy in the php extensions I'd get core dumps, so when I switched to strdup instead of strcpy things seemed to work ok. If new[] is going to be used as standard then I might as well change all the strdup's to strcpy with new[].... > > I've posted 0.8.3 on sourceforge. Sorry about CVS, does anyone have any > ideas how to get through a firewall onto sourceforge (no socks server > either)? > Aside from opening a firewall port the only thing that comes to mind is to use a bouncer/port forwarder that will forward connections from some open port on your internal network to an outside port for cvs. CVS port is 2401 tcp/udp -pedja |
|
From: <am...@ma...> - 2003-10-21 21:24:33
|
I read through the FAQ, and that's one of the places where I noted them suggesting to use the same analyzer for indexing and searching. As it is now, there's no way for a user to specify the analyzer in CLucene, but I'm sure that will eventually change now that the topic has been brought up :) If I recall correctly, you did mention in one of your old posts that some hits were missing so my thinking was that it was analyzers' fault and hardcoded all to StandardAnalyzer. Never thought to actually compare the index with and without the same analyzers... -pedja > > Is it possible that you could just try it both ways, and compare the > results to grep, and see if your missing hits re-appear ? > > Did you look over the FAQ from the original Java Lucene, and in > particular this question: > > http://lucene.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/faq/faqmanager.cgi?file=chapter.indexi ng&toc=faq#q15 > > --Rob > |
|
From: Ben v. K. <s40...@st...> - 2003-10-21 06:16:11
|
Hi All, Still haven't got CVS access... so here's some more changes. I followed on from Rob's work and found a few more instances of using delete where delete[] should have been used. I've replaced the stringDuplicate function with a function that allocates memory using new[] then doing a stringCopy. So I think there shouldn't be any code that uses malloc anymore. However i ran a quick comparison check using the tests program, comparing the old code that uses malloc against the new code that uses new[]. The old codes seems to be the slightest big faster. Does anyone know about if if there's any performance issues of malloc vs new[]? I also looked through all the places where "delete " was being used and found a few arrays that needed to be changed to "delete[]". Hopefully that gets them all, but Rob if you could check with valgrind when you get time. Also Rob, if you have time could you look at the tests program. I know there's some terrible test code in there (almost no resources are freed ;~} but when i run the tests in cygwin i get a segfault during the === Test Query Parser === test. I've posted 0.8.3 on sourceforge. Sorry about CVS, does anyone have any ideas how to get through a firewall onto sourceforge (no socks server either)? cheers, ben |
|
From: Ben v. K. <s40...@st...> - 2003-10-21 06:05:09
|
Hi all, Just figured out why you guys were raving about the speed change. It's because previously the data was being stored and now it isn't (the *.fdt file is where it is usually kept). You'll notice the indexes are also MUCH smaller. But if you try to retrieve the "contents" field you won't be able to now. But that shouldn't be a problem :) ben |
53 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
