|
From: Viliam H. <vil...@uc...> - 2009-04-16 10:45:36
|
Hi all, so I'll be probably the first one who will omit this ;) Isn't there an easier way? I.e. what if the revision number would be automatically the svn revision number? I'm not an expert in svn hooks though. Viliam On 16. Apr (Thursday) v 11:23:15 +0100 2009, Julien Charles wrote: > Hi all, > I have added the revision numbering to the version number because it is > quite useful when you are testing the program. > Actually there is some kind of bug (maybe a feature...?) that arises when > doing that is that a commit doesn't change your local version > of the repository, while changes the remote version, at least this happens > with subclipse. > So be sure to _update_ after any commit otherwise you will get bad version > number. > > Julien > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and > around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save > $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. > 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. > Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p > _______________________________________________ > Clops-users mailing list > Clo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clops-users -- Viliam |