Re: [Clonezilla-live] on-the-fly performance
A partition and disk imaging/cloning program
Brought to you by:
steven_shiau
|
From: Lukas G. <luk...@co...> - 2010-04-09 07:49:31
|
On 31.03.2010 11:10, Steven Shiau wrote: > Right now I do not have real machines which I can test. Therefore I can > not give you the numbers. > If anyone on this forum has such numbers to share, please share that. > > BTW, there is a performance improvement in partclone 0.2.8, and it's now > included in clonezilla live 20100330-karmic. Could you please give it a > try? To see if any big difference. > Please let us know the results if you try that. So, I tried the 20100330 clonezilla ISO and the results with the speed are the same. I think the main reason for that bad speed is, that on the client side (the vm, where the physical machine is migrated to) the partclone.restore process procudes almost 100% CPU load. (It's s a vm with two cores, but it only uses one). I think that is the main bottleneck. > > Regards, > Steven. > > On 2010/3/29 下午 11:31, Lukas Grässlin wrote: >> Both SATA Disks, the destination is a virtual machine but I did some >> IO-Performance tests with dd on the virtual machine. It is definitely >> able to write and read with more than 20MB/s. (I did dd if=/dev/sda >> of=/dev/zero bs=100M count=10 etc.) >> >> The network can't really limit the speed, so I don't know what is >> could be. >> >> What's your experience with the speed? Is it faster? >> >> I'll do some tests on my own with dd and netcat or so. >> >> ((sorry, forgot to click the reply-all button ;) )) >> >> >> On 29.03.2010 16:26, Steven Shiau wrote: >>> How about the speed when you save the image? >>> What's the disk types in the source and destination machines? SATA? >>> PATA? USB? Or? >>> >>> Steven. >>> >>> Lukas Grässlin wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> whats's you experience with the onthefly migration (that partclone over >>>> netcat thing) especially perfomance? >>>> >>>> I never get more than ~300MB/min (=~ 5MB/s) in a Gigabit network which >>>> is very dissappoiting. I already tried it without compression etc but I >>>> didn't get more speed. (Further the machines are fast enough to do it >>>> faster than 5MB/s with compression). >>>> >>>> Is that a partclone issue? Have you any ideas? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Lukas >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > -- Lukas Grässlin Collax GmbH . Basler Str. 115a . 79115 Freiburg . Germany p: +49 (0) 89-990 157-23 Collax - Simply Linux. Geschäftsführer: Boris Nalbach AG München HRB 158898 * Ust.-IdNr: DE 814464942 |