Re: [Clonezilla-live] on-the-fly performance

[Steven S. <st...@nc...>]

Hi James,

James Dutton wrote:
> Hi Steven:
>
> Now you have me confused.  I checked sourceforge and the copy of
> 20100330-karmic is the same version I downloaded and tested yesterday
> morning. No change in size - 126877696 bytes. Are we out of sync by
> one day? Or maybe you are receiving too many emails at this time?
> Here is the testing results I emailed yesterday, are they the results
> you are looking for?
>   
You can check the file packages.txt in your Clonezilla live 
20100330-karmic, search "partclone", if it's 0.2.8-1drbl, then we are 
talking about the same one. Since this is a minor update, so the size is 
the same. However, you can compare that with md5sum or sha1sum, they 
must be different.
> 0308-karmic - calculate bitmap = 39sec - image copy = 9.972min - avg
> speed = 804.0 mb/min - block size 4096 bytes - block count 1969406
>
> 0318-karmic - calculate bitmap = 4.04min - image copy = 12.15min - avg
> speed = 650.5 mb/min - block size 4096 bytes - block count 1969406
>
> 0330-karmic - calculate bitmap = 13sec - image copy = 8.32min - avg
> speed = 960.39mb/min - block size 4096 bytes - block count 2000815
>   
OK, so now 20100330-karmic is the fastest one, good!
Thanks.

Steven.
> Best Regards,
>
> Jim Dutton
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Steven Shiau <st...@nc...> wrote:
>   
>> Hi James,
>> Yes, we found there is an issue about partclone 0.2.7 performance. Therefore
>> another Clonezilla live 20100330-karmic was uploaded with partclone 0.2.8
>> included. This issue should have been gone.
>> Could you please give it a try?
>> Please let us know the results.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Steven.
>>
>>
>>     

-- 
Steven Shiau <steven _at_ nchc org tw> <steven _at_ stevenshiau org>
National Center for High-performance Computing, Taiwan. http://www.nchc.org.tw
Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 1024D/9762755A
Fingerprint: A2A1 08B7 C22C 3D06 34DB  F4BC 08B3 E3D7 9762 755A