Menu

stdin.001 problem

Help
2007-02-21
2013-04-05
  • Mike at Village

    Mike at Village - 2007-02-21

    Hi,

    I too have the problem reported by rdchin so am trying cifs instead of smbfs.  I have created the image on the server OK but during the restore process I am having the error  "can't read the following volume file: /stdin.001"

    I'm asked to enter a new file name but the screen is locked up :-(

    Any idea ?

     
    • Steven Shiau

      Steven Shiau - 2007-02-21

      We need more info, so please post the details about the steps you start the restoration.
      Also post the file info in the images by:
      1. After you mount samba server public folder to /home/partimag, run
      a. df > debug.log
      b. ls -alF /home/partimag >> debug.log
      c. ls -alF /home/partimag/$IMAGENAME >> debug.log
      $IMAGENAME with yours)
      Then post debug.log here.

       
    • Mike at Village

      Mike at Village - 2007-02-21

      Thankyou.  I performed standard steps for image restore, accepting default settings.  First partition (FAT32) seemed to be OK, error occured with second partition (ReiserFS).

      mount -t cifs -o username=images //172.16.15.4/images/smb /home/partimag

      debug.log is:

      Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
      tmpfs                   242136         0    242136   0% /lib/init/rw
      udev                     10240        52     10188   1% /dev
      tmpfs                   242136         4    242132   1% /dev/shm
      rootfs                  302616     77648    224968  26% /
      /dev/hdc                 75172     75172         0 100% /live_media
      tmpfs                   242136     17168    224968   8% /cow
      tmpfs                   242136         0    242136   0% /tmp
      //172.16.15.4/images  74750656  10973152  63777504  15% /home/partimag
      total 1012
      drwx--x--x 4 1001 users       0 Feb 21  2007 ./
      drwxr-xr-x 4 root root       80 Feb 21 03:40 ../
      drwxr-xr-x 2 1001 users       0 Feb 21  2007 basic_dual/
      -rwxr--r-- 1 1001 users     581 Feb 21  2007 debug.log*
      drwxr-xr-x 2 1001 users       0 Feb 21  2007 test/
      basic_dual
      debug.log
      test

       
    • Mike at Village

      Mike at Village - 2007-02-21

      is this information of use ?  Content of test (name I assigend to the image).

      drwxr-xr-x  2 images users       4096 2007-02-21 16:29 ./
      drwx--x--x  4 images users       4096 2007-02-21 16:28 ../
      -rwxr--r--  1 images users        259 2007-02-21 15:35 cifs1b*
      -rwxr--r--  1 images users        259 2007-02-21 15:35 cifs2b*
      -rwxr--r--  1 images users         80 2007-02-21 16:26 debug.log*
      -rwxr--r--  1 images users          4 2007-02-21 15:41 disk*
      -rw-r--r--  1 root   root           0 2007-02-21 16:29 files.log
      -rwxr--r--  1 images users         10 2007-02-21 15:41 parts*
      -rwxr--r--  1 images users         36 2007-02-21 15:35 sda-chs.sf*
      -rwxr--r--  1 images users        512 2007-02-21 15:35 sda-mbr*
      -rwxr--r--  1 images users        259 2007-02-21 15:35 sda-pt.sf*
      -rw-------  1 images users  409507485 2007-02-21 15:39 sda1.aa
      -rw-------  1 images users 1116988559 2007-02-21 15:41 sda3.aa

       
    • Steven Shiau

      Steven Shiau - 2007-02-22

      Interesting. The image looks fine. reiserfs in clonezilla does not have any problem here.
      Now please do more testing in Clonezilla live with //172.16.15.4/images is mounted as /home/partimag:
      1. run
         file /home/partimag/$IMAGENAME/sda3.aa > file.log
         please post file.log here
      2. use verbose mode to run ocs-sr as root (sudo su -) by:
         a. cp /etc/screenrc ~/.screenrc
         b. edit ~/.screenrc, find
            defscrollback 1000
            make it larger, like:
            defscrollback 100000
         c. run "screen" to enter screen
         d. bash -x /opt/drbl/sbin/ocs-sr -x
            remember to choose "-v" and "-nogui"
         e. wait for the error, then use "ctrl-a [" (press ctrl-a, release them, then press [), this will enter screen copy/scrollback mode. You can use ctrl-b (pageup), ctrl-f pagedown), j(down), k(up), h(left), l(right) to scrollback the screen. Find the beginning of "ocs-sr -x", then use "space bar" key to mark the beginning of the copy, then move to the end of the ocs-sr error, and use "space bar" key to mark the end of the copy.
         f. In the same screen terminal, use vim, jove or whatever editor you are familiar with. For example, vim
            vim ocs-err.log
            enter edit mode in vim (i.e. press i), then use "ctrl-a ]" to paste the one you put in the buffer of screen.
            enter command mode in vim (i.e. press esc), save the file by ":wq".
         g. post ocs-err.log here.

      Sorry for such a long procedure. However, with this, it's easier for us to know why it fails.

           
       

       
    • Mike at Village

      Mike at Village - 2007-02-22

      Please bear with me... I'm struggling with the vi editor at the moment (I am new to Linux) but will reply soon.

       
    • Mike at Village

      Mike at Village - 2007-02-22

      Please, for clarification... after I press spacebar to mark end of ocs-sr error I seem to be still in "screen", do I need to exit this in some way to then vim ocs-err.log ?

      Thanks

       
    • Mike at Village

      Mike at Village - 2007-02-22

      Oh,

      I tried yet again (4th attempt), after managing to edit screenrc.

      This time it all worked perfectly !  I had moved the PC on to a different network connection so I wonder if this had been a problem somewhow. ???

      So far I am very pleased with the speed of this application.

      Thankyou

      Mike

       
      • Steven Shiau

        Steven Shiau - 2007-02-22

        Clonezilla is nothing to do with .screenrc. No idea where went wrong there. But at least now it's working for you. Good.
        If you use PXEboot clonezilla with gigabits NIC, the speed will be faster, I think. Someone reported that the restoring speed is about 1.6-2.0 GB/min. Here it's about 1.5  GB/min.

         
    • Mike at Village

      Mike at Village - 2007-02-22

      Oh,

      The problem has returned again, this time using a different image file.  It failed the first time, succeeded the second time, failed the third time.  On the 2 occasions of failure it failed at a different stage/partition but the error "can't read the following volume file: /stdin.001" was the same (also says "LZOP: <stdin>: checksum error".

      can you advise on my earlier question "... after I press spacebar to mark end of ocs-sr error I seem to be still in "screen", do I need to exit this in some way to then vim ocs-err.log ?"

      Many thanks

       
      • Steven Shiau

        Steven Shiau - 2007-02-22

        About ".. after I press spacebar to mark end of ocs-sr error I seem to be still in "screen", do I need to exit this in some way to then vim ocs-err.log ?", no, you have to be in the same screen terminal.
        If you see "LZOP: <stdin>: checksum error", I guess it's the network problem. This also explains that why you saw "can't read the following volume file: /stdin.001", since lzop is complaining the source image has checksum error. The network quality might not be good. Maybe you can replace the network cable or switch. Or if you have USB disk, you can try to mount it as /home/partimag if the free space is large enough.

        Good luck.

         
    • Mike at Village

      Mike at Village - 2007-02-22

      Many many thanks,

      I think you are correct in saying it may be a network quality issue.  I have just performed the image restore process again (same image file, same client PC, same options), this time the client PC has booted correctly into both the Win2k and SUSE Linux partitions. 

      I'll need to check all the networking components, maybe make a direct link from PC to Server without hub/switch and use quality cable.

      Again, many thanks for this superb application and many thanks for your support.

      Mike

       
      • Steven Shiau

        Steven Shiau - 2007-02-22

        No problem, do our best. If you replace hardware, yet the problem still remains, please let us know.
        BTW, just got an email from sf.net about donation you made. We'd like to say thank you very much. Appreciate that.

         
    • Mike at Village

      Mike at Village - 2007-02-22

      My pleasure,

      I'm still having problems relating to the network, I think it's mainly the on-board NICs in these cheap PCs !  The image restore process works most of the time but occasionally I get the  Win2k blue screen when trying to boot (corrupted .dll file in Win2k).  Restoring the image again seems to either fix it or the Win2k blue screen reports a different .dll fault.  The SUSE Linux partition is always OK :-)  Sadly I built the server from one of these cheap machines so I think I'll install a PCI NIC.

      Would optional error checking be possible in a future release of Clonezilla-Live.  Along with a little more GUI to cover the sudo su, mounting the cifs/smbfs etc. ?

      Thanks again.

       
      • Steven Shiau

        Steven Shiau - 2007-02-23

        Did you use partimage or ntfsclone (option -q) when saving the image ? By default clonezilla will use ntfsclone to save the NTFS image, it's compatibility is better than partimage. For ntfsclone, as I remember, it will verify the data. Here we never has such problem when clone NTFS, and no one ever reported this problem in the past few years.
        BTW, maybe you should do a memory test in your client machine, sometimes those weird problems are due to bad RAM. You can do it by booting Clonezilla live CD, and in the boot menu, check the 3rd choice.
        As for the GUI about sudo su -, mouting samba server... We will try it. Maybe it will be added in the next release if we make it.

         
    • Mike at Village

      Mike at Village - 2007-02-23

      Hi Steven,

      I used the default (ntfsclone), if fact I used all default settings.  I'll run a memory check on one of the client machines today.  They are very cheap systems so maybe my problems lie there :-(  I have 59 of them to set up so finding a cloning system is important.  I have used Norton Ghost 2003 in the past but can't get it to work now and their new version is, in my opinion, useless.

      Regards

      Mike

       
      • Steven Shiau

        Steven Shiau - 2007-02-23

        You have 59 clients ? I think you need multicast clone, so I suggest you to use pxe-boot clonezilla instead of clonezilla live.
        For more info about pxeboot clonezilla, check http://clonezilla.sf.net
        Basically what you need is to setup a DRBL server, then pxeboot clonezilla is ready. For the time being, I suggest you to use clonezilla 2.1, now it's in testing branch. Since the image format is same with that in clonezilla live. The one in the stable branch is still clonezilla 1.x, so its format is not compatible with clonezilla live,  which uses clonezilla 2.x format.

         
        • Steven Shiau

          Steven Shiau - 2007-02-26

          Basically all the function in Clonezilla live is same with pxeboot Clonezilla, except multicast is not available in Clonezilla live.
          As for Slackware... well, maybe in the future, pxeboot Clonezilla will be ready on that. Sorry for that.

           
    • Mike at Village

      Mike at Village - 2007-02-26

      Thanks Steven,

      My DHCP/FTP server is running Slackware Linux, which is not one of the distributions listed on the Clonzilla site.

      "Sorry but it will NOT work in other distributions or versions." :-(

      I'm trying a few more options here but if all fail then I'll set up SUSE 10 or 10.1 on a system and try Clonezilla 2.1

      Regards

      Mike

       
    • Ron Kelley

      Ron Kelley - 2007-04-02

      Just to follow-up on this a little...

      I see the same issues on my GigE network occasionally.  The main problem seems to be the use of the LZOP compression tool instead of gzip or bzip2.

      I wonder if the LZOP compression tool is a little less forgiving with network latency that the other tools?

       
    • Steven Shiau

      Steven Shiau - 2007-04-02

      So you mean when you use gzip or bzip2, you never has this problem ?

       
      • richardc

        richardc - 2007-04-05

        I have the same problem as above.
        I created a hard disk image with clonezilla live(1.7) and saved it to a samba share, with default settings.
        I boot the target machine with clonezilla live, follow the instructions on screen and get
        std001 file not found.
        I ran it again this time "checking"
           turning off the partimage gui and
           set verbose options
        now I see... check sum error,  file not found stdin.001...
        I'll try to create a new image with gzip instead of lzo.

         
        • Steven Shiau

          Steven Shiau - 2007-04-06

          We had similar issue before, most of the cases are the network quality problem, either the network cable or network switch.

           
    • Steven Shiau

      Steven Shiau - 2007-04-07

      If possible, maybe you can try to use the version 20070406 in
      http://opensource.nchc.org.tw/clonezilla-live/testing/
      The lzop program in that version is recompiled with LZO 2, maybe it will work better.
      Please let us know the results if you do such a comparison test.

       

Log in to post a comment.

Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.