Re: PORT: documentation beyond the docstring?

[Sam S. <sd...@gn...>]

> * sam <fnz_znvy@jbjznvy.pbz> [2003-11-11 08:51:45 -0800]:
>
> I'm pretty new to the lisp community

then you probably don't really need PORT yet.

if you are new, you should take one implementation that you like and
stick with the ANSI features.  Only when you find yourself in need of
something not covered by CLHS, you should search for it in PORT.


-- 
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k
<http://www.camera.org> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://www.memri.org/>
<http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.honestreporting.com>
Takeoffs are optional.  Landings are mandatory.