You can subscribe to this list here.
2000 |
Jan
(38) |
Feb
(206) |
Mar
(150) |
Apr
(124) |
May
(183) |
Jun
(212) |
Jul
(124) |
Aug
(91) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(10) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
Jan
(39) |
Feb
(36) |
Mar
(47) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(97) |
Jul
(66) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(31) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(64) |
2002 |
Jan
(69) |
Feb
(125) |
Mar
(133) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(101) |
Aug
(87) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(15) |
2003 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(11) |
2004 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(4) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2006 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(12) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(7) |
Jul
|
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(3) |
2008 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(21) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(1) |
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Raymond T. <toy...@gm...> - 2015-04-09 16:48:06
|
Oops. Wrong mailing list! Sorry about that. On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Raymond Toy <toy...@gm...> wrote: > Before the change over to gitlab, I had set up a git post-receive hook > so that all commits were sent to the cmucl-commit (and cvs) mailing > lists. (The hook also automatically updated a trac issue, but that > seems not necessary anymore with gitlab.) > > I can't seem to find out how to do that now. There's a page on web > hooks, but I can't easily tell what I'm supposed to do with that. I > just want each commit to be sent to the cmucl-commit mailing list. > > -- > Ray > > > -- Ray |
From: Raymond T. <toy...@gm...> - 2015-04-09 03:05:54
|
Before the change over to gitlab, I had set up a git post-receive hook so that all commits were sent to the cmucl-commit (and cvs) mailing lists. (The hook also automatically updated a trac issue, but that seems not necessary anymore with gitlab.) I can't seem to find out how to do that now. There's a page on web hooks, but I can't easily tell what I'm supposed to do with that. I just want each commit to be sent to the cmucl-commit mailing list. -- Ray |
From: Santu M. <san...@gm...> - 2012-12-03 07:22:43
|
Thanks Pascal for the reply. And thanks for the link to http://cliki.net/. On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Pascal J. Bourguignon < pj...@in...> wrote: > Santu Mahapatra <san...@gm...> writes: > > > Common Lisp Hackers, > > > > I am a newbie with just over one year experience in Web development. > > Everywhere I read about the power of lisp and really want to use it. > > > > It is very easy to get sites running using ASP .NET, wordpress, RoR > > or Django. I have worked on production sites using the first two. And > > personally tried on small projects on the last two. > > > > I know there are CL frameworks out there. But can someone please help > > me about the best maintained one. > > > > I really want to use CL professionally if it is so good and even > > contribute to the frameworks in any small manner possible. > > It's definitely quite possible and easy to write web sites in Common > Lisp. > > But this mail list is probably not the best place to ask, it's about a > specific CL library (clocc), and it's rather very low traffic. > > > You'd have more answers asking on news:comp.lang.lisp > or on irc://irc.freenode.org/#lispweb > ( or on irc://irc.freenode.org/#lisp ) > or on the lispweb mail-list: > http://www.red-bean.com/mailman/listinfo/lispweb > > You can also have a look at http://cliki.net/ in particular: > http://cliki.net/Getting%20Started > http://cliki.net/site/search?query=web > etc. > > > -- > __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ > A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: > TUNE You got it built. Now make it sing. Tune shows you how. > http://goparallel.sourceforge.net > _______________________________________________ > clocc-devel mailing list > clo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clocc-devel > -- Santu Mahapatra |
From: Pascal J. B. <pj...@in...> - 2012-11-30 19:35:06
|
Santu Mahapatra <san...@gm...> writes: > Common Lisp Hackers, > > I am a newbie with just over one year experience in Web development. > Everywhere I read about the power of lisp and really want to use it. > > It is very easy to get sites running using ASP .NET, wordpress, RoR > or Django. I have worked on production sites using the first two. And > personally tried on small projects on the last two. > > I know there are CL frameworks out there. But can someone please help > me about the best maintained one. > > I really want to use CL professionally if it is so good and even > contribute to the frameworks in any small manner possible. It's definitely quite possible and easy to write web sites in Common Lisp. But this mail list is probably not the best place to ask, it's about a specific CL library (clocc), and it's rather very low traffic. You'd have more answers asking on news:comp.lang.lisp or on irc://irc.freenode.org/#lispweb ( or on irc://irc.freenode.org/#lisp ) or on the lispweb mail-list: http://www.red-bean.com/mailman/listinfo/lispweb You can also have a look at http://cliki.net/ in particular: http://cliki.net/Getting%20Started http://cliki.net/site/search?query=web etc. -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}. |
From: Santu M. <san...@gm...> - 2012-11-30 13:28:41
|
Common Lisp Hackers, I am a newbie with just over one year experience in Web development. Everywhere I read about the power of lisp and really want to use it. It is very easy to get sites running using ASP .NET, wordpress, RoR or Django. I have worked on production sites using the first two. And personally tried on small projects on the last two. I know there are CL frameworks out there. But can someone please help me about the best maintained one. I really want to use CL professionally if it is so good and even contribute to the frameworks in any small manner possible. Thanks in advance. -- Santu Mahapatra |
From: Tapiwa G. <tap...@gm...> - 2012-11-10 18:27:25
|
"Keep your coding high and your expectations low." - I like, I will add that to my bucket of nuggets. I wrote the output formatting in a modular way so that more formats can be added in the future. The one output format compatible with other testing frameworks that I have already added is TAP, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_Anything_Protocol. I actually had not thought about a migration strategy for tests from different frameworks. Hopefully this would be something that can be done with a community effort. I have emailed the mailing lists of the developers of most frameworks mentioned in Phil's blog and a few others. I guess now we wait and see. Thanks a lot for the message of encouragement and support. Likewise all the best to you with your library. I actually haven't heard of it so maybe you can post a link on this mailinglist just incase its something I might need down the line. Regards, Tapiwa On 10 November 2012 20:09, Faré <fa...@gm...> wrote: > Dear Tapiwa, > > > It was at the point I stumbled on François-René blog, I decided to take > up > > the challenge and consolidate the unit testing frameworks. I have no > > experience in working on community efforts so I came here because I > believe > > this is were I can get the most useful advice and constructive criticism. > > > Thanks a lot for undertaking this project! > Keep your coding high and your expectations low. > > > I have written a framework that aims to consolidate all the major > features > > of the frameworks mentioned in Phil's blog. You can find it on Github > > https://github.com/tgutu/clunit > > > I haven't personally investigated the space of testing frameworks enough > to make any claim as to the appropriate thing to do, > whether it is creating a new framework indeed, or > starting from one of the existing ones. > (Hell, in my own pet domain, data structures, > I have indeed started a new framework, LIL, so I won't cast any stone). > > However, let me just say that unless you can indeed convince > a sizable number of users and developers that > your new framework is indeed the Right Thing™, > for which you will need to have very good arguments, > then starting a new framework will have achieved the opposite of the goal, > i.e. more fragmentation rather than more consolidation. > > Also, not mentioned on Phil's blog are some frameworks that can produce > an output compatible with testing frameworks for other languages, > which allows for unified interfaces to test and test statistics. > I haven't used any of them, just heard about them. > > > I wrote a blog on the development of the framework and reasons for it > here > > http://ml.sun.ac.za/2012/11/09/developing-a-unit-test-framework-part-1/for > > those who are interested. > > > Whatever happens, please don't get discouraged. > If you do one library well and it indeed becomes THE library for the topic, > you will have done more than if you do ten bad libraries. > > Nevertheless, a big part of the challenge of a community is > to get the conversation going with users and with developers of other > solutions. > I suggest you contact the developers and/or users of each existing > framework > and get familiar with how they see things. > > Finally, it is interesting to think of an eventual transition strategy. > Is it a matter of rewriting clients to use your new interface? > Is it a matter of writing compatibility systems that express the old > interfaces > in terms of the new one? > > Best of luck! > > —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• > http://fare.tunes.org > Economics is the plural of Morality. > |
From: Faré <fa...@gm...> - 2012-11-10 18:09:39
|
Dear Tapiwa, > It was at the point I stumbled on François-René blog, I decided to take up > the challenge and consolidate the unit testing frameworks. I have no > experience in working on community efforts so I came here because I believe > this is were I can get the most useful advice and constructive criticism. > Thanks a lot for undertaking this project! Keep your coding high and your expectations low. > I have written a framework that aims to consolidate all the major features > of the frameworks mentioned in Phil's blog. You can find it on Github > https://github.com/tgutu/clunit > I haven't personally investigated the space of testing frameworks enough to make any claim as to the appropriate thing to do, whether it is creating a new framework indeed, or starting from one of the existing ones. (Hell, in my own pet domain, data structures, I have indeed started a new framework, LIL, so I won't cast any stone). However, let me just say that unless you can indeed convince a sizable number of users and developers that your new framework is indeed the Right Thing™, for which you will need to have very good arguments, then starting a new framework will have achieved the opposite of the goal, i.e. more fragmentation rather than more consolidation. Also, not mentioned on Phil's blog are some frameworks that can produce an output compatible with testing frameworks for other languages, which allows for unified interfaces to test and test statistics. I haven't used any of them, just heard about them. > I wrote a blog on the development of the framework and reasons for it here > http://ml.sun.ac.za/2012/11/09/developing-a-unit-test-framework-part-1/ for > those who are interested. > Whatever happens, please don't get discouraged. If you do one library well and it indeed becomes THE library for the topic, you will have done more than if you do ten bad libraries. Nevertheless, a big part of the challenge of a community is to get the conversation going with users and with developers of other solutions. I suggest you contact the developers and/or users of each existing framework and get familiar with how they see things. Finally, it is interesting to think of an eventual transition strategy. Is it a matter of rewriting clients to use your new interface? Is it a matter of writing compatibility systems that express the old interfaces in terms of the new one? Best of luck! —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org Economics is the plural of Morality. |
From: Tapiwa G. <tap...@gm...> - 2012-11-10 17:17:23
|
Faithful hackers, About two weeks ago I reached a point were I really needed to find a unit testing framework. And just as François-René pointed out here http://fare.livejournal.com/169346.html the list of potential frameworks was mind numbingly long. Anyway, luckily Phil's blog reviewed most of the frameworks [ http://aperiodic.net/phil/archives/Geekery/notes-on-lisp-testing-frameworks.html] so I was able to set on one for a while. But as pointed out, the frameworks always cover a small part of the problem domain. There were things in the other frameworks that I really liked but it wasn't sensible to use more than one test framework. It was at the point I stumbled on François-René blog, I decided to take up the challenge and consolidate the unit testing frameworks. I have no experience in working on community efforts so I came here because I believe this is were I can get the most useful advice and constructive criticism. I have written a framework that aims to consolidate all the major features of the frameworks mentioned in Phil's blog. You can find it on Github https://github.com/tgutu/clunit I wrote a blog on the development of the framework and reasons for it here http://ml.sun.ac.za/2012/11/09/developing-a-unit-test-framework-part-1/ for those who are interested. Regards, Tapiwa Gutu |
From: Raymond T. <toy...@gm...> - 2012-11-06 03:49:55
|
>>>>> "Fare" == Far <Far> writes: Fare> Dear CLOCC-devel hackers, Fare> I've started an initiative to consolidate Common Lisp libraries: Fare> http://fare.livejournal.com/169346.html Fare> In the spirit of consolidation, I'm looking for a existing mailing-list Fare> to host the high-level discussion of such an effort Fare> before I dare open a new one. Fare> After the demise of the cl-gardeners and cclan-list mailing-lists, Fare> I wonder if your mailing-list is an appropriate place to discuss these things, Fare> or if it's restricted to a specific body of code currently in CLOCC. Seems that this list is about as alive as cl-gardeners or cclan-list. (Well, I'm guessing since I'm not on those lists.) I don't think such a discussion is forbidden here. After all, CLOCC stands for Common Lisp Open Code Collection. I don't know how many people still read this list though. Ray |
From: Faré <fa...@gm...> - 2012-11-06 01:13:52
|
Dear CLOCC-devel hackers, I've started an initiative to consolidate Common Lisp libraries: http://fare.livejournal.com/169346.html In the spirit of consolidation, I'm looking for a existing mailing-list to host the high-level discussion of such an effort before I dare open a new one. After the demise of the cl-gardeners and cclan-list mailing-lists, I wonder if your mailing-list is an appropriate place to discuss these things, or if it's restricted to a specific body of code currently in CLOCC. —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org There are three types of people in the world; those who can count, and those who can't. |
From: Marco A. <ma...@cs...> - 2012-02-01 13:10:14
|
Apologies for the multiple postings. PAPER SUBMISSION DEADLINE EXTENDED European Lisp Symposium 2012, Zadar, Croatia, April 30th - May 1st, 2012 http://european-lisp-symposium.org The purpose of the European Lisp Symposium is to provide a forum for the discussion and dissemination of all aspects of design, implementation and application of any of the Lisp and Lisp-inspired dialects, including Common Lisp, Scheme, Emacs Lisp, AutoLisp, ISLISP, Dylan, Clojure, ACL2, ECMAScript, Racket, SKILL, and so on. We encourage everyone interested in Lisp to participate. The main theme of the 2012 European Lisp Conference is "Interoperability: Systems, Libraries, Workflows". Lisp based and functional-languages based systems have grown a variety of solutions to become more and more integrated with the wider world of Information and Communication Technologies in current use. There are several dimensions to the scope of the solutions proposed, ranging from "embedding" of interpreters in C-based systems, to the development of abstractions levels that facilitate the expression of complex context dependent tasks, to the construction of exchange formats handling libraries, to the construction of theorem-provers for the "Semantic Web". The European Lisp Symposium 2012 solicits the submission of papers with this specific theme in mind, alongside the more traditional tracks which have appeared in the past editions. We invite submissions in the following forms: Papers: Technical papers of up to 15 pages that describe original results or explain known ideas in new and elegant ways. Demonstrations: Abstracts of up to 4 pages for demonstrations of tools, libraries, and applications. Tutorials: Abstracts of up to 4 pages for in-depth presentations about topics of special interest for at least 90 minutes and up to 180 minutes. Lightning talks: Abstracts of up to one page for talks to last for no more than 5 minutes. All submissions should be formatted following the ACM SIGS guidelines and include ACM classification categories and terms. For more information on the submission guidelines and the ACM keywords, see: http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates and http://www.acm.org/about/class/1998. Important dates: February 15th 2012: submission deadline (extended deadline) March 7th 2012: acceptance results April 30th 2012: Conference opens Program Commitee. Chair: Marco Antoniotti, Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Milan, ITALY Local organizers: Damir Cavar, Eastern Michigan University Franjo Pehar, University of Zadar Damir Kero, University of Zadar Members: Giuseppe Attardi, Università degli Studi di Pisa, Pisa, ITALY Pascal Costanza, Intel, Bruxelles, BELGIUM Marc Feeley, Université de Montreal, Montreal, CANADA Scott McKay, Google, U.S.A. Kent Pitman, U.S.A. Christophe Rhodes, Department of Computing, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UNITED KINGDOM Robert Strandh, LABRI, Université de Bordeaux, Bordaux, FRANCE Didier Verna, EPITA / LRDE, FRANCE Taiichi Yuasa, Kyoto University, JAPAN -- Marco Antoniotti |
From: Marco A. <ma...@cs...> - 2012-01-23 11:58:35
|
Apologies for the multiple postings... =========================================================================== European Lisp Symposium 2012, Zadar, Croatia, April 30th - May 1st, 2012 http://european-lisp-symposium.org The purpose of the European Lisp Symposium is to provide a forum for the discussion and dissemination of all aspects of design, implementation and application of any of the Lisp and Lisp-inspired dialects, including Common Lisp, Scheme, Emacs Lisp, AutoLisp, ISLISP, Dylan, Clojure, ACL2, ECMAScript, Racket, SKILL, and so on. We encourage everyone interested in Lisp to participate. The main theme of the 2012 European Lisp Conference is "Interoperabilty: Systems, Libraries, Workflows". Lisp based and functional-languages based systems have grown a variety of solutions to become more and more integrated with the wider world of Information and Communication Technologies in current use. There are several dimensions to the scope of the solutions proposed, ranging from "embedding" of interpreters in C-based systems, to the development of abstractions levels that facilitate the expression of complex context dependent tasks, to the construction of exchange formats handling libraries, to the construction of theorem-provers for the "Semantic Web". The European Lisp Symposium 2012 solicits the submission of papers with this specific theme in mind, alongside the more traditional tracks which have appeared in the past editions. We invite submissions in the following forms: Papers: Technical papers of up to 15 pages that describe original results or explain known ideas in new and elegant ways. Demonstrations: Abstracts of up to 4 pages for demonstrations of tools, libraries, and applications. Tutorials: Abstracts of up to 4 pages for in-depth presentations about topics of special interest for at least 90 minutes and up to 180 minutes. Lightning talks: Abstracts of up to one page for talks to last for no more than 5 minutes. All submissions should be formatted following the ACM SIGS guidelines and include ACM classification categories and terms. For more information on the submission guidelines and the ACM keywords, see: http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates and http://www.acm.org/about/class/1998. Important dates: Jan 31st 2012: submission deadline Feb 21st 2012: acceptance results April 30th, 2012 Conference opens Program Commitee. Chair: Marco Antoniotti, Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Milan, ITALY Local organizers: Damir Ćavar, Eastern Michigan University Franjo Pehar, University of Zadar Damir Kero, University of Zadar Members: Giuseppe Attardi, Università degli Studi di Pisa, Pisa, ITALY Pascal Costanza, Intel, Bruxelles, BELGIUM Marc Feeley, Université de Montreal, Montreal, CANADA Scott McKay, Google, U.S.A. Kent Pitman, U.S.A. Christophe Rhodes, Department of Computing, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UNITED KINGDOM Robert Strandh, LABRI, Université de Bordeaux, Bordaux, FRANCE Didier Verna, EPITA / LRDE, FRANCE Taiichi Yuasa, Kyoto University, JAPAN -- Marco Antoniotti |
From: Marco A. <ma...@cs...> - 2011-11-17 16:16:12
|
Apologies for the multiple postings.... ================================================================ European Lisp Symposium 2012, Zadar, Croatia, April 30th - May 1st, 2012 http://european-lisp-symposium.org The purpose of the European Lisp Symposium is to provide a forum for the discussion and dissemination of all aspects of design, implementation and application of any of the Lisp and Lisp-inspired dialects, including Common Lisp, Scheme, Emacs Lisp, AutoLisp, ISLISP, Dylan, Clojure, ACL2, ECMAScript, Racket, SKILL, and so on. We encourage everyone interested in Lisp to participate. The main theme of the 2012 European Lisp Conference is "Interoperabilty: Systems, Libraries, Workflows". Lisp based and functional-languages based systems have grown a variety of solutions to become more and more integrated with the wider world of Information and Communication Technologies in current use. There are several dimensions to the scope of the solutions proposed, ranging from "embedding" of interpreters in C-based systems, to the development of abstractions levels that facilitate the expression of complex context dependent tasks, to the construction of exchange formats handling libraries, to the construction of theorem-provers for the "Semantic Web". The European Lisp Symposium 2012 solicits the submission of papers with this specific theme in mind, alongside the more traditional tracks which have appeared in the past editions. We invite submissions in the following forms: Papers: Technical papers of up to 15 pages that describe original results or explain known ideas in new and elegant ways. Demonstrations: Abstracts of up to 4 pages for demonstrations of tools, libraries, and applications. Tutorials: Abstracts of up to 4 pages for in-depth presentations about topics of special interest for at least 90 minutes and up to 180 minutes. Lightning talks: Abstracts of up to one page for talks to last for no more than 5 minutes. All submissions should be formatted following the ACM SIGS guidelines and include ACM classification categories and terms. For more information on the submission guidelines and the ACM keywords, see: http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates and http://www.acm.org/about/class/1998. Important dates: Jan 31st 2012: submission deadline Feb 21st 2012: acceptance results April 30th, 2012 Conference opens Program Commitee. Chair: Marco Antoniotti, Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Milan, ITALY Local organizers: • Damir Ćavar, Eastern Michigan University • Franjo Pehar, University of Zadar • Damir Kero, University of Zadar Members: • Giuseppe Attardi, Università degli Studi di Pisa, Pisa, ITALY • Pascal Costanza, Intel, Bruxelles, BELGIUM • Marc Feeley, Université de Montreal, Montreal, CANADA • Scott McKay, Google, U.S.A. • Kent Pitman, Hypermeta, U.S.A. • Christophe Rhodes, Department of Computing, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UNITED KINGDOM • Robert Strandh, LABRI, Université de Bordeaux, Bordaux, FRANCE • Didier Verna, EPITA / LRDE, FRANCE -- Marco Antoniotti |
From: Raymond T. <toy...@gm...> - 2011-07-14 15:41:12
|
Did someone change the hg not to send diffs on commits? I didn't notice before, but since around Apr 1 of this year, the hg commit mesages no longer include diffs. Before Apr 1, they did. Currently the messages just include the log message and a list of the number of lines added/changed/deleted, but not the acutal diffs anymore. Or is it something else with the mailing lists? Ray |
From: Raymond T. <toy...@gm...> - 2011-03-30 19:33:41
|
On 3/30/11 3:04 PM, Sam Steingold wrote: >> * Raymond Toy <gbl.enlzbaq@tznvy.pbz> [2011-03-30 14:57:09 -0400]: >> >> On 3/29/11 1:35 PM, Sam Steingold wrote: >>>> * Raymond Toy <gbl.enlzbaq@tznvy.pbz> [2011-03-17 17:41:25 -0400]: >>>> >>>> So, do people want to see the commit messages? >>> yes, please! >> Done. All commit messages now go to clocc-devel. The subject line will >> allow people to filter out the commit messages. > I think filtering by sender is more reliable; > thus I suggest "strip = 5" > What does that mean? You're an admin too, so feel free to modify /home/scm_hg/c/cl/clocc/clocc/.hg/hgrc if you want to. Ray |
From: Sam S. <sd...@gn...> - 2011-03-30 19:04:10
|
> * Raymond Toy <gbl.enlzbaq@tznvy.pbz> [2011-03-30 14:57:09 -0400]: > > On 3/29/11 1:35 PM, Sam Steingold wrote: >>> * Raymond Toy <gbl.enlzbaq@tznvy.pbz> [2011-03-17 17:41:25 -0400]: >>> >>> So, do people want to see the commit messages? >> yes, please! > Done. All commit messages now go to clocc-devel. The subject line will > allow people to filter out the commit messages. I think filtering by sender is more reliable; thus I suggest "strip = 5" -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.5 (Final) X http://dhimmi.com http://truepeace.org http://camera.org http://iris.org.il http://www.memritv.org http://mideasttruth.com Crooks cannot be voted out of power as long as they count the votes. |
From: Raymond T. <toy...@gm...> - 2011-03-30 18:57:18
|
On 3/29/11 1:35 PM, Sam Steingold wrote: >> * Raymond Toy <gbl.enlzbaq@tznvy.pbz> [2011-03-17 17:41:25 -0400]: >> >> So, do people want to see the commit messages? > yes, please! Done. All commit messages now go to clocc-devel. The subject line will allow people to filter out the commit messages. Ray |
From: Raymond T. <toy...@gm...> - 2011-03-29 23:24:08
|
On 3/29/11 1:35 PM, Sam Steingold wrote: >> * Raymond Toy <gbl.enlzbaq@tznvy.pbz> [2011-03-17 17:41:25 -0400]: >> >> So, do people want to see the commit messages? > yes, please! Are you not receiving them already on clocc-cvs? >> If yes, do you want them to continue on the unarchived cvslog list or >> do you want them to go to clocc-devel, as previously suggested by Sam? > how about you make them go to clocc-devel and then if people complain > (or leave in droves :-) switch to something else? > Ok. I'm glad you responded because I was going to do that anyway, because no had responded, so it must not matter, right? ;-) The random binary junk at the end is a bit troublesome, but I don't know what causes it and no one on the mercurial mailing list has an idea on the cause. Could be something about the relatively old version of hg on sourceforge? I'll make the switch soon. Ray |
From: Sam S. <sd...@gn...> - 2011-03-29 17:35:29
|
> * Raymond Toy <gbl.enlzbaq@tznvy.pbz> [2011-03-17 17:41:25 -0400]: > > So, do people want to see the commit messages? yes, please! > If yes, do you want them to continue on the unarchived cvslog list or > do you want them to go to clocc-devel, as previously suggested by Sam? how about you make them go to clocc-devel and then if people complain (or leave in droves :-) switch to something else? -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.5 (Final) X http://honestreporting.com http://camera.org http://thereligionofpeace.com http://jihadwatch.org http://ffii.org http://www.memritv.org Bug free software merely has random features. |
From: Raymond T. <toy...@gm...> - 2011-03-17 21:41:53
|
>>>>> "Sam" == Sam Steingold <sd...@gn...> writes: >> * Raymond Toy <gbl.enlzbaq@tznvy.pbz> [2011-03-10 10:24:47 >> -0500]: >> >> On 3/10/11 9:54 AM, Sam Steingold wrote: >>>> * Raymond Toy <gbl.enlzbaq@tznvy.pbz> [2011-03-10 00:15:15 >>>> -0500]: >>>> >>>> Can a clocc admin take a look into that? >>> please do - you are now one of the admins :-) >> No can do. :-) I don't have the clocc-cvslog password to get to >> the mailman interface. Sam> me neither. Stefan, could you please share the password with Stefan has responded. According to him, he disabled/deleted the list long ago. I have no interest in reviving that list. So, do people want to see the commit messages? If yes, do you want them to continue on the unarchived cvslog list or do you want them to go to clocc-devel, as previously suggested by Sam? Ray |
From: Sam S. <sd...@gn...> - 2011-03-10 19:50:16
|
> * Raymond Toy <gbl.enlzbaq@tznvy.pbz> [2011-03-10 10:24:47 -0500]: > > On 3/10/11 9:54 AM, Sam Steingold wrote: >>> * Raymond Toy <gbl.enlzbaq@tznvy.pbz> [2011-03-10 00:15:15 -0500]: >>> >>> Can a clocc admin take a look into that? >> please do - you are now one of the admins :-) > No can do. :-) I don't have the clocc-cvslog password to get to the > mailman interface. me neither. Stefan, could you please share the password with Ray? -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.3 (Final) X http://memri.org http://truepeace.org http://pmw.org.il http://dhimmi.com http://jihadwatch.org http://thereligionofpeace.com http://iris.org.il A computer scientist is someone who fixes things that aren't broken. |
From: Raymond T. <toy...@gm...> - 2011-03-10 15:24:55
|
On 3/10/11 9:54 AM, Sam Steingold wrote: >> * Raymond Toy <gbl.enlzbaq@tznvy.pbz> [2011-03-10 00:15:15 -0500]: >> >> Can a clocc admin take a look into that? > please do - you are now one of the admins :-) No can do. :-) I don't have the clocc-cvslog password to get to the mailman interface. Ray |
From: Sam S. <sd...@gn...> - 2011-03-10 14:54:12
|
> * Raymond Toy <gbl.enlzbaq@tznvy.pbz> [2011-03-10 00:15:15 -0500]: > > Can a clocc admin take a look into that? please do - you are now one of the admins :-) > Are we intentionally not archiving these? no. -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on CentOS release 5.3 (Final) X http://honestreporting.com http://openvotingconsortium.org http://dhimmi.com http://www.PetitionOnline.com/tap12009/ http://memri.org http://truepeace.org Garbage In, Gospel Out |
From: Raymond T. <toy...@gm...> - 2011-03-10 05:15:47
|
On 3/9/11 10:02 AM, Sam Steingold wrote: >> * Raymond Toy <gbl.enlzbaq@tznvy.pbz> [2011-03-08 23:24:45 -0500]: >> >> I think it would be nice to have commit messages sent out with hg >> pushes. Perhaps we can use the changegroup hook given in >> <http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/Hook#The_changegroup_hook>. These >> seem relatively simple to setup and we can just send all mail to the >> clocc-cvs list. This just gives the commit messages. >> >> Or perhaps the NotifyExtension >> <http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/NotifyExtension>, which will send out >> diffs. (I kind of like diffs, but perhaps people consider that to be >> too cluttered for commit messages.) > > I think diffs should go to clocc-devel and push notifications to > clisp-list. I enabled the NotifyExtension and it appears to be working. At least it sends mail to me on each push. However, the email contains random garbage at the end, after the diff. Don't know what that's about. Also, I'm sending the diffs to clocc-cvslog. Haven't seen them yet, but I guess they are held and then sent in batches. (I wish it was done this way, though.) But has any one bothered to look at the mailing list archive for clocc-cvslog? The latest entry in the archive is from 2002. Can a clocc admin take a look into that? Are we intentionally not archiving these? Ray |
From: Raymond T. <toy...@gm...> - 2011-03-09 21:58:03
|
On 3/9/11 3:55 PM, Drew McDermott wrote: >> [Sam Steingold] >>> * Raymond Toy <gbl.enlzbaq@tznvy.pbz> [2011-03-08 20:37:13 -0500]: >>> Please test this out to see if it looks like what you expect. >> there are 3 heads now: tip, ytools-2-0-dev, ytools-1-2-dev. >> I think the ytools owner should close the extra heads (at least the >> latter one) see http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/PruningDeadBranches >> >>> The only issue I can see is that there are .cvsignore files, but I >>> guess that's to be expected. >> well, they all should be eventually merged into the top-level .hgignore. >> I don't want to do that automatically because the many .cvsignore files >> under, say, f2cl, contain huge lists. >> I think the package owners should handle that themselves, carefully >> removing files which should not be ignored. > Bring me up to date. I don't seem to have received any email about > any of this previously. What is "selenic"? > Don't know what selenic is, other than what www.selenic.com says. But the whole issue was moving clocc from cvs to something else. Sam had raised this question a few years ago, but nothing came of it. With the recent hack attack on SourceForge, and the recent deprecation of CVS on SourceForge, we decided to move to another supported version control system. (This was all discussed on this mailing list over the last couple of weeks.) The selected version control system is hg. I converted the CVS repo to hg using cvs2hg and pushed the changes to sourceforge. Ray |