From: Bruno H. <ha...@il...> - 2001-03-22 00:40:45
|
Sam Steingold writes: > is there any reason why `def-atomic-type' and `def-compound-type' are > not defined in a `macrolet'? 2 reasons: - These two macros may be useful outside type.lisp. The same way as "define-compiler-macro" is useful for some people. - Aesthetics: I don't want to have a 32-line macrolet. Bruno |