From: Sam S. <sd...@gn...> - 2002-10-19 02:22:41
|
> * In message <157...@ho...> > * On the subject of "Re: call-arguments-limit" > * Sent on Sat, 19 Oct 2002 03:48:06 +0200 (CEST) > * Honorable Bruno Haible <ha...@il...> writes: > > Sam writes: > > we will not have to bother with the places in C code where we keep an > > address in STACK too since STACK comes just before the heap and we can > > move the stuff from the beginning of the heap to its end (and increase > > the heap in the way). > > Clever!! thanks. > But note that it works only in particular memory models > (SPVW_MIXED_BLOCKS_OPPOSITE && !TRIVIALMAP_MEMORY, if I'm not > mistaken). I am not doing this then. I know nothing about this memory model business. I sincerely hope that you will find some time for this... -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running RedHat8 GNU/Linux <http://www.camera.org> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://www.memri.org/> <http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.palestine-central.com/links.html> All extremists should be taken out and shot. |