From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-04-16 20:55:19
|
Feature Requests item #1701623, was opened at 2007-04-16 17:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lkuehne You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=590802&aid=1701623&group_id=89627 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nascif Abousalh Neto (nascif) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Indicate input jar file name in reports Initial Comment: Clirr allows you to specify multiple jar files at once as input, but the output reports (both text and xml) do not differentiate between them. In a large code base, the means the consumer of the report might have to do the "detective" work of mapping the packages back to the .jar files that contains them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Lars Kühne (lkuehne) Date: 2007-04-16 22:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=401384 Originator: NO Nascif, could you provide a use case where this has been a real problem for you? Was it an open source project I could look at? If not, how many jars, how many class files, etc? I'm asking to figure out the priority of this RFE. Note to implementor: Keep in mind that it's probably not a good idea to hardcode the notion of a "jar" in the output. I'm thinking about IDE plugins where the source file would probably be more appropriate, so each class should have the more general notion of an "origin" instead of a "jar". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=590802&aid=1701623&group_id=89627 |