[Clirr-devel] CVS: clirr/xdocs contributing.xml,1.4,1.5

[<lk...@us...>]

Update of /cvsroot/clirr/clirr/xdocs
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv19535/xdocs

Modified Files:
	contributing.xml 
Log Message:
reference ASL2 instead of LGPL

Index: contributing.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/clirr/clirr/xdocs/contributing.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- contributing.xml	6 Aug 2005 12:59:46 -0000	1.4
+++ contributing.xml	18 Mar 2006 20:22:52 -0000	1.5
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
             </p>
             <p>
                 Note that anything you contribute must have the same license
-                as the rest of Clirr, i.e. LGPL, Copyright Lars Kühne.
+                as the rest of Clirr, i.e. ASL2, Copyright Lars Kühne.
             </p>
         </section>
         <section name="Copyright Lars? Why not copyright myself?">
@@ -37,27 +37,27 @@
             </p>
             <p>
                 In fact it doesn't. Think about it: You give copyright to Lars,
-                Lars immediately gives you the right to use the code under LGPL.
+                Lars immediately gives you the right to use the code under ASL2.
                 What have you lost? You can still
             </p>
             <ul>
                 <li>claim authorship in the Javadoc or other comments,
                     so credit goes where it should.</li>
                 <li>redistribute the code in source or binary form
-                    (provided the terms of the LGPL are met).</li>
+                    (provided the terms of the license are met).</li>
                 <li>use the code in a commercial environment or link it into IDEs.</li>
                 <li>fork the codebase if you are not happy with the way
                     Lars is running the project.</li>
             </ul>
             <p>
-                Because the code is licensed under the LGPL,
+                Because the code is licensed under the ASL2,
                 the only thing you give up by assigning copyright to Lars
                 is the right to veto a re-licensing of the code.
-                For example Lars could re-license Clirr under
-                the Apache license without having to contact
+                For example Lars could eventually re-license Clirr under
+                a new version of the Apache license without having to contact
                 everybody who has ever contributed.
                 Note that you would not lose any of the work you (and others)
-                have done as it would still be licensed under LGPL - <em>noone
+                have done as it would still be licensed under ASL2 - <em>noone
                 can ever take these rights away from you</em>!
             </p>
         </section>