RE: [Clirr-devel] maven plugin
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
lkuehne
From: Vincent M. <vma...@pi...> - 2004-07-05 07:16:41
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: cli...@li... [mailto:clirr-devel- > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Simon Kitching > Sent: lundi 5 juillet 2004 08:02 > To: cli...@li... > Subject: Re: [Clirr-devel] maven plugin >=20 > On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 17:47, Lars K=FChne wrote: > > Simon Kitching wrote: > > > > > > > OK, so the plan is to have two top level modules, core and maven. > > > > The top level package structure is not affected by that move, I = don't > > think Maven requires the module name to occur as a package name. = This > > means we can have: > > > > clirr-core.jar > > + n.s.c.core (includes only Checker) > > + n.s.c.core.event > > + n.s.c.core.internal.framework (not to be used by integration > frontends) > > + n.s.c.core.internal.checks (dito) > > + n.s.c.cli > > + n.s.c.ant > > >=20 > Sorry, what do you mean by "module"? >=20 > I see *four* basic packages: > n.s.c.core > n.s.c.ant > n.s.c.cli > n.s.c.maven >=20 > If the above package structure is what is proposed, I like it. > Have I misunderstood? Oh cool. I like it too. >=20 > > > > On our web site we can follow Vincent's suggestion and have a = toplevel > > menu entry like > > > > Integrations > > + Ant > > + Command Line > > + Maven >=20 > Yep, looks nice. >=20 > > >I've been thinking it's about time for a 0.4 release. If you're > > >interested in getting others to use clirr then it might be a good = idea > > >to get this new release out the door. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yep, let's get that Maven plugin ready and then release 0.4. >=20 > I think the ant/maven enhancement I suggested in recent emails is > *really important* for users. >=20 > Given the decision to issue ERROR level messages for lots of things = that > may not be a problem for users depending upon context (eg adding = method > to interface only breaks systems where users are expected to implement > those interfaces), I think it is really important to give users the > ability to selectively ignore certain errors being reported by clirr > when using the ant or maven tasks. >=20 Agreed. > Personally, I would really like to see this (pretty simple) feature > added before the 0.4 release.... I'm fine with either. It can happen in 0.5 a week after 0.4 is delivered = and I wouldn't mind. It's up to you guys really. Thanks -Vincent |