Update of /cvsroot/clirr/clirr/core/src/java/net/sf/clirr/core
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv27488
Modified Files:
ScopeSelector.java
Log Message:
* Fix checkstyle issue: lines longer than 110 chars
* Fix spelling accessability -> accessibility
Index: ScopeSelector.java
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/clirr/clirr/core/src/java/net/sf/clirr/core/ScopeSelector.java,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
--- ScopeSelector.java 11 Jul 2004 10:33:50 -0000 1.2
+++ ScopeSelector.java 18 Jul 2004 01:06:10 -0000 1.3
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
public final class ScopeSelector
{
/**
- * Represents an "accessability" level for a java class, field or method.
+ * Represents an "accessibility" level for a java class, field or method.
* <p>
* Change of access rights from lower to higher visibility rating is a
* binary-compatible change. Change of access rights from higher to
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@
* base class and so are valid parameters to this method.
* <p>
* Note that despite JavaClass objects extending AccessFlags, the
- * methods which determine the accessability of a JavaClass fail
+ * methods which determine the accessibility of a JavaClass fail
* miserably (bad bcel design) for nested classes. Therefore this
* method <i>must not</i> be passed a JavaClass object as a parameter.
* If this is done, a RuntimeException will be thrown to indicate a
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
* base class and so are valid parameters to this method.
* <p>
* Note that despite JavaClass objects extending AccessFlags, the
- * methods which determine the accessability of a JavaClass fail
+ * methods which determine the accessibility of a JavaClass fail
* miserably (bad bcel design) for nested classes. Therefore this
* method <i>must not</i> be passed a JavaClass object as a parameter.
* If this is done, a RuntimeException will be thrown to indicate a
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@
* base class and so are valid parameters to this method.
* <p>
* Note that despite JavaClass objects extending AccessFlags, the
- * methods which determine the accessability of a JavaClass fail
+ * methods which determine the accessibility of a JavaClass fail
* miserably (bad bcel design) for nested classes. Therefore this
* method <i>must not</i> be passed a JavaClass object as a parameter.
* If this is done, a RuntimeException will be thrown to indicate a
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@
* base class and so are valid parameters to this method.
* <p>
* Note that despite JavaClass objects extending AccessFlags, the
- * methods which determine the accessability of a JavaClass fail
+ * methods which determine the accessibility of a JavaClass fail
* miserably (bad bcel design) for nested classes. Therefore this
* method <i>must not</i> be passed a JavaClass object as a parameter.
* If this is done, a RuntimeException will be thrown to indicate a
@@ -261,7 +261,9 @@
{
if (object instanceof JavaClass)
{
- throw new RuntimeException("getScope called for JavaClass object. This is not permitted;" + " use method getClassScope for JavaClass objects.");
+ throw new RuntimeException(
+ "getScope called for JavaClass object. This is not permitted;"
+ + " use method getClassScope for JavaClass objects.");
}
@@ -337,7 +339,9 @@
if (enclosingClass == null)
{
- throw new CheckerException("Unable to locate enclosing class " + enclosingClassName + " for nested class " + jclassName);
+ throw new CheckerException(
+ "Unable to locate enclosing class " + enclosingClassName
+ + " for nested class " + jclassName);
}
ConstantPool pool = enclosingClass.getConstantPool();
@@ -367,7 +371,9 @@
}
// weird; no nested class info found
- throw new CheckerException("Unable to find information in class " + enclosingClass.getClassName() + " referring back to nested class " + jclassName);
+ throw new CheckerException(
+ "Unable to find information in class " + enclosingClass.getClassName()
+ + " referring back to nested class " + jclassName);
}
}
|
