Re: [Classifier4j-devel] level two

[Nick L. <ni...@ma...>]

karl wettin wrote:

> I really like the simplicity of the C4J API, but think it's too bad  
> there is no support for other than nominal values. Have you  
> considered to add support for numeric values in the interfaces? I'd  
> love to plug in the Weka J48 (and others) to the same API. The C4J  
> classifiers could simply treat the numeric values as nominal. It  
> would also be nice with more than one dimension of classes per  
> classifier, i.e. rows and columns.
>
> How about that? Or is this outside the indended scope of C4J? Perhaps  
> I should make my own facade that handles both Weka and C4J in a  
> simple way?
>

I'm quite interested in this, but I have to admit I don't understand the 
distinction between numeric & nominal values. Can you explain this some 
(to save me some googling-time...)?

Nick