Re: [Classifier4j-devel] Dev Plan
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
nicklothian
From: Peter L. <pe...@le...> - 2003-08-30 08:22:39
|
Hi Nick, I'm currently compiling both Classifier4J & Classifier4J-Optional at the same time. I agree with having the same package structure for the tests (of the same project), but I wouldn't recommend having the same package structure across two projects (Classifier4J & Classifier4J-Optional). The situation we're seeing here is two different classes being generated (or attempted to be generated) with the same fully qualified class name net.sf.classifier4J.bayesian.AllTests in the following locations: classifier4j\Classifier4J\src\test\net\sf\classifier4J\bayesian\AllTests.jav a classifier4j\Classifier4J-Optional\src\test\net\sf\classifier4J\bayesian\All Tests.java Even if the compilation is done separately, if we refer to net.sf.classifier4J.bayesian.AllTests, we're going to get the AllTest classes from either Classifier4J or Classifier4J-Optional depending on where both jars are in the classpath (which is really bad)... Regards, Peter Leschev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick Lothian" <ni...@ma...> To: <cla...@li...> Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 2:12 PM Subject: Re: [Classifier4j-devel] Dev Plan > How are you compiling it? > > I intended the optional package to be a totally stand-alone project, so it > shouldn't be compiling to the same target directory as the normal > Classifier4J project (which would cause the errors you are seeing). > > I put it in the same package so that we can use package-level access to > methods if we need to (in particular for the tests, since often I find that > is a useful technique). > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter Leschev" <pe...@le...> > To: "Nick Lothian" <ni...@ma...>; > <cla...@li...> > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 5:45 PM > Subject: Re: [Classifier4j-devel] Dev Plan > > > > Heya, > > > > > If you look at the code for the examples in Classifier4J-Optional, > > Is there a reason why you've kept the same package structure in Optional? > > I'm getting compilation errors complaining that there are two > > net.sf.classifier4J.bayesian.AllTests classes. Could we put all the > optional > > classes in the net.sf.classifier4J.optional package? (eg > > net.sf.classifier4J.optional.bayesian etc). > > > > Pete > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware > > With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. > > WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines > > at the same time. Free trial click > here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0 > > _______________________________________________ > > Classifier4j-devel mailing list > > Cla...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/classifier4j-devel > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Classifier4j-devel mailing list > Cla...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/classifier4j-devel > |