Re: [Classifier4j-devel] Dev Plan

[Peter L. <pe...@le...>]

Heya,

> If you look at the code for the examples in Classifier4J-Optional,
Is there a reason why you've kept the same package structure in Optional?
I'm getting compilation errors complaining that there are two
net.sf.classifier4J.bayesian.AllTests classes. Could we put all the optional
classes in the net.sf.classifier4J.optional package? (eg
net.sf.classifier4J.optional.bayesian etc).

Pete