[CK-Ledger-users] Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] CK-Ledger

[C K Wu <ck...@ho...>]

Hi, Bob,

Thank you for considering CK-Ledger for your internal use and as a 
possible sale offering
to your clients.

Bob Crandell ??:

>Hi,
>
>I'm trying to move my company's accounting from Quickbooks to either SLQ-Ledger or
>CK-Ledger.  I showed both to my secretaries.  They chose SQL-Ledger.  Now they are
>grumbling whcih means we're still stuck with Quickbooks.  So I showed them CK-Ledger
>again.  They like it better.  Maybe there's hope?
>
>I hope your still here, CK.
>
>Questions:
>
>If I presented some specific requests geared toward improving inventory handling,
>would you be willing to do that?  Or anybody for that matter?
>
Your request will be actioned along with other requestors'. All usual 
considerations apply here.
Such considerations include ease of implementation, value of features 
proposed, existing
development schedule, etc, etc, etc ...

>
>One of the services I would like to provide is to handle the accounting needs of
>some of the smaller companies around here that are great technicians but are still
>poor because they don't enter their time.  Will this handle more than one company?
>  
>
Yes. it would. To allow better data demarcation, you could utilize 
phpgw's virtual domain
feature. To allow centralised backup, you could use CK-Ledger's own 
attribute accounting
feature. A more detail explanation is available from (ledger admin -> 
multiple ledger) .

At the risk of antagonising you and other list members, I like to 
highlight the following points,

a) As a standard rider, CK-Ledger is still in beta, so bugs are 
inevitable. This fact should
be highlighted to your (potential) customers.

b) CK-Ledger is designed for use by SMEs. Advanced features are, by 
definition, missing
or to be developed in the very, very distant future.

c) You may like to review ck-...@li...'s 
archive. There are a
few instances, at which, I, effectively, asked the feature requestor to 
choose some
other software instead.

d) If you are selling CK-Ledger installation and/or support service to 
your client, you should be
independently knowledgeable about CK-Ledger and its various 
idiosyncrosies and
shortcomings. The public mailing list and CK-Ledger's existing user base 
should
not be used as your consultant if you are selling CK-Ledger consultancy 
services to your clients.

I hope I haven't offend you too much :-) . But these are things that I 
think you should be
aware of before proceeding further.

Cheers,
CK

>I suppose I need to sign up for yet another mailing list.
>
>Thanks
>
>--
>Bob Crandell
>Assured Computing
>When you need to be sure.
>bo...@as...
>www.assuredcomp.com
>Voice - 541-689-9159
>FAX - 541-463-1627
>Eugene, Oregon
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Phpgroupware-developers mailing list
>Php...@gn...
>http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-developers
>
>
>  
>