[CK-Ledger-users] Re: CK-Ledger
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
ckwu
|
From: C K Wu <ck...@ch...> - 2002-08-03 16:56:25
|
Hi, Mark, Thank you for your interest in CK-Ledger. The straight answer to your question is "It is extremely difficult". It involves reproducing the infrastructure provided by phpgroupware's API, which includes screen handling, user account maintenance, database abstraction, installation facility, etc. In fact, it is the existence of these infrastructure that allow me to concentrate on the business logic and be able to develop the system in a rather rapid fashion. However, if your existing authentication system is ldap based. You may be about to integrate your authentication mechanism with phpgroupware's. But, I am totally ignorant in this area. You can get more info on this at the mailing list, php...@gn... php...@gn... or at phpgroupware's website, www.phpgroupware.org In addition, I like to add that CK-Ledger is still in beta, so bugs are inevitable. PS - I am sending a copy of this reply to ck-...@li..., so the others are aware of current development. Cheers, CK Mark Kepley wrote: > Hi CK, Kudos, you have put in a lot of hard work in the ledger > system!! I' m look at your system from the POS to AR side. What would > it take to change the CL-Ledger so that it doesn't have to run on > phpgroupware as I already have an authentication system in place? I'm > looking to replace a legacy POS/AR system. I plan to integrate into > our main system on a GL or POS transaction level. Regards, Mark Kepley |