CJam Activity
A stack-oriented programming language suitable for code golfing
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
aditsu
Activity for CJam
-
Chiel ten Brinke created ticket #105
Make divide by zero evaluate to zero
-
aditsu modified a wiki page
Home
-
erikkonstas posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
Please stop being a lazy bum and make a new release already! With what am I supposed to golf otherwise? Jelly and 05AB1E get boring, CJam might not be the golfiest, but it's surely more interesting IMO!
-
Because TIO pulls the latest code from the source repository, not the latest released code. I didn't explicitly agree to that, but I can see why people would want to do that, and the code is free after all. It was supposed to be just a temporary situation, but it got prolonged way too much because I kept being busy with other things and didn't make a new release.
-
Wait, why does n work on TIO then? Example: CJam, 2 bytes Ln Try it online!
-
Wait, why does n work on TIO then?
-
Hi, you have a point, but I added n after the last release of CJam, and haven't made a new release since then. So if you download the latest jar file or run some code at http://cjam.aditsu.net/ , n won't work. I plan to document it when/after I actually release it. So your request should probably be "please stop being a lazy bum and make a new release already!" instead :)
-
The n command exists, and what it does is printing a, then printing a newline. Unfortunately, it isn't present on the documentation. Care to add it please? I don't like using oNo, N+o, o' o or ' +o instead of n :)
-
The n command exists, and what it does is printing a, then printing a newline. Unfortunately, it isn't present on the documentation. Care to add it please?
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Extended operators
-
Home
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Extended operators
-
Extended operators
-
Actually, the behaviour would be different from m!. In your example, the first permutation...
-
Martin Büttner posted a comment on ticket #104
I don't think the order is arbitrary at all. This behaviour would be consistent with...
-
Well, that would be possible, but it gets complicated. We'd need to get into the...
-
Right, but couldn't you just give the elements comparable identities? E.g. if the...
-
e! uses a somewhat different algorithm. It generates the permutations in lexicographic...
-
Sp3000 pointed out that this is because e! does an implicit sort. That seems like...
-
e! doesn't work on certain mixed-type arrays
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Extended operators
-
Operators
-
Basic operators
-
Extended operators
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Operators
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Add a println operator
-
Implemented, will release in next version.
-
fixed ticket 61 - Add a println operator ("n")
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
fixed parsing of blocks containing numbers like...
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Sp3000 posted a comment on ticket #103
I was thinking more of the general case, e.g. 1.23.4 for [1.23 .4] ([1.2 3.4] or...
-
You can get that with 1d.1
-
Float parsing
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Extended operators
-
Operators
-
Extended operators
-
Extended operators
-
Operators
-
Basic operators
-
BigInteger can't be an index
-
Operators
-
Basic operators
-
Operators
-
Basic operators
-
Basic operators
-
Operators
-
Basic operators
-
Fixed, will release in next version
-
Cjam crashes on parsing windows line endings
-
fixed ticket 99 - crash on parsing windows line...
-
Make ew work with two integers
-
Operators
-
Basic operators
-
Basic operators
-
Operators
-
Basic operators
-
Basic operators
-
b as a monadic function
-
Well, I don't think it's worth implementing it like that. It would only save 1 byte,...
1 >
