RE: [Civlog-list] CivLog-0.6.1

[Wong TM (H. Deming) <loo...@ma...>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: civ...@li...
> [mailto:civ...@li...]On Behalf Of Raimar
> Falke
> Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 11:37 AM
> To: CivLog List
> Subject: Re: [Civlog-list] CivLog-0.6.1
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 05:24:15PM +0200, Ulrich Kuhn wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Raimar Falke wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 12:54:09AM +0200, Raimar Falke wrote:
> > BTW: Raimar: Your CLTimer may be unprecise on certain platforms. For
> > example in windows 9x Java is not able to be more precise than 50 or 60 ms
> > when invoking System.currentTimeMillis(). So when repeatedly invoking the
> > start and stop methods you may get many 50ms entries where only 100ns is
> > used...
>
> It is more or less a quick hack. It is better than leaving longs all over
> the place. I have no control over the time resolution on certain platforms.
> However IMHO the code for CLTimer is correct.

I afraid on lousy win98 system, it is(the loading) now around 10x slower. Maybe
we ask Bill Gate to opensource Win98 and we fix it :)