Re: [ciphertool-devel] more ideas for standards
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
wart
|
From: Alex G. <za...@za...> - 2004-03-03 16:03:39
|
Hi, >I think we should continue to use the above text, without the >legalese at the top of the file... > > OK. I took off everything before the line 'Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus', and I removed everything after the line 'lost in darkness and distance.' The new MD5 is: 8306191547cfd7ca2d04a0d7604fc852 The main thing I'm trying to do is provide some standards for comparing search and scoring techniques. The standards I'm proposing aren't even necessarily for inclusion and distribution with the end-user ciphertools package, but rather for researching better methods. Also, people from outside the project might be interested in comparing their techniques and this would make sure everyone is on the same page. >The word list that I've been using for my personal solving is version 15 >of the UKACD: >http://www.ori.org/~kenl/projects/wordlist/UKACD-readme.htm >I've made some slight modifications, adding a few new words and removing >a few uncommon others. > I've read a bit more about the SCOWL word lists: http://wordlist.sourceforge.net/scowl-readme UKACD is apparently included in the SCOWL 'size 80' list and higher. Also, according to this site*:** http://bryson.ltd.uk/wordlist.html UK Advanced Cryptics Dictionary* has been superseded by the *Edited English* word list provided as part of TEA Crossword Helper <http://bryson.ltd.uk/tea.html> and Sympathy <http://bryson.ltd.uk/sympathy.html>. However, I think this new list isn't public. >The nice thing about this word list is that it >includes plurals and all of the various verb conjugations. > These inflected forms are used in the SCOWL word lists as well. I suggest that we standardize on either a frozen version of your list or the SCOWL size 80 list. Ultimately though, I think it would be best to use a standard wordlist from one of the maintained public lists here: http://wordlist.sourceforge.net/ Again, this would be the list for comparing techniques, not necessarily the most opimized for a certain method or ciphertext. -Alex > > > |