From: Andrich v. W. <avw...@gm...> - 2009-07-17 14:00:43
|
I vote Yes, but we should think at looking into using more iterators (and iterables) in that case, especially within our collection and topology classes as they focus heavily on it (see the FAQ on their wiki, or go through the API, if you haven't done so already). Also they have a lot of classes that cannot be extended (mostly to do with Immutable collections), just something to remember. On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Gary Pampara <gpa...@gm...> wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to propose the addition of google-collections as a dependency > of > CIlib. The additional functionality would be really useful. > > Regards, > Gary > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, > vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have > the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize > details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge > _______________________________________________ > cilib-devel mailing list > cil...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cilib-devel > -- Andrich van Wyk |