From: Gary P. <gpa...@gm...> - 2009-07-14 07:29:00
|
Hmmm. This does make the implementation rather complex. One the one hand, having the entity know about its strategy parameters (if any) could be a good thing, however, the problem does come in where the strategy parameters are shared amoungst entities. I'm not really sure that this will be a simple addition. Regards, Gary On Monday 13 July 2009 13:37:10 Andries Engelbrecht wrote: > Hi, > > > 1. Where should the definition of the initialization for these extra > > parameters be placed? On the individual? In the EC algorithm? Within the > > IterationStrategy? > > You refer to the Strategy parameters here. What we have to remember > is that strategy parameters can be "global" or "local". What I mean by > this is that the same parameter can be used for all individuals, or each > individual can have its own parameter. The latter can have an even > smaller granularity in that each dimension of each individual can have > its own strategy parameter. We should also think about cultural > algorithms where there is a bielief space, which have some relation > to strategy parameters. The solution should take the latter into account. > > We may argue that not all EAs have strategy parameters, e.g. GA. > However, in our implementation, parameters such as crossover and > mutation probability can be seen as strategy parameters with no > adaptation. > > So the question is where does strategy parameters belong? My > feeling is that these should belong to Algorithms. Not just EC > algorithms, but all algorithms. Remember that PSO and others > also have "strategy parameters". performIteration will then have > a call to some strategy to "adapt" the parameters. And this > basically should replace ControlParameters. > > > 2. How should mutation be handled? Should the strategies know to inspect > > the individual for strategy parameters? Should the mutation rather be > > done in a separate class? > > Remember that mutation can be applied in PSO and others. Mutation > is a separate process, that may, or may not make use of the > strategy parameters. So, mutation should be a separate class. > > This then also tells me that the strategy parameters should be on > a higher level than on entity level. > > > Regards, > > Gary > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >----- Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > > This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, > > vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have > > the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full > > prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge > > _______________________________________________ > > cilib-devel mailing list > > cil...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cilib-devel |