|
From: Gary P. <gpa...@gm...> - 2009-06-03 05:25:45
|
I suppose one possible solution would be to have a reposnse strategy that informs a parent level algorithm that it should perform it's repsonse strategy. The others would create M-N relationships where you would end up not knowing what response strategy to invoke. Anyone have any other ideas? Regards, Gary On Wednesday 03 June 2009 07:14:40 Gary Pampara wrote: > Hi Marde, > > I was actually wondering when we would need functionality as you have > described here. The current detection / response implementation is a little > limited as you have discovered. > > I'll have a look at it. The potential solution I'm thinking of might > require a fair amount of work to get it going. > > Regards, > Gary > > On Tuesday 02 June 2009 23:14:17 Marde Greeff wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I want to do the following: > > > > For the VEPSO algorithm that solves a dynamic MOO problem, the following > > must be possible: > > > > 1) All swarms detect for a change > > 2) If any swarm detects a change, all swarms respond to the change > > > > However, with the current implementation the detection and response > > occurs on the swarm level in the DynamicIterationStrategy class. > > > > What is the best way to do this? > > > > Marde > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >--- OpenSolaris 2009.06 is a cutting edge operating system for enterprises > looking to deploy the next generation of Solaris that includes the latest > innovations from Sun and the OpenSource community. Download a copy and > enjoy capabilities such as Networking, Storage and Virtualization. Go to: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/opensolaris-get > _______________________________________________ > cilib-devel mailing list > cil...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cilib-devel |