On 12 January 2013 14:33, Gabriel Kerneis <gabriel@kerneis.info> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 01:31:34PM -0800, Jonathan Kotker wrote:
> Is there anything else I should be including? The above files seem to be
> the only ones the tool needs. Or is there a better way to go about this
> entire process?

It looks good to me.  CIL should be more modular, avoid these hard-coded paths,
etc. but I've thought several times about it and I'm not sure how to do it

If it's useful, I can type up a blog post on this for those who are interested.
By the way, if you want your users to target other architecture, consider
documenting/using --envmachine (which avoids recompiling CIL).

Oh, that's a useful tip. I'll try that! Thanks. :)