Re: [chiPHPug-discuss] good article

[Nola S. <mrn...@gm...>]

>Ruby on Rails is Windows, PHP is UNIX.  Both get the job done one is
completely in your control.

Thats absurd.

The point of the article was that this guy, through learning another
language/framework he improved his php.



On 9/30/07, Anacreo <an...@gm...> wrote:
>
> Jason,
>   Thanks for sharing that article.  I'd have to say that after playing
> with
> Ruby on Rails and being very excited about it, I dropped it like a dead
> fish.  I kind of agree with the author.  I don't think PHP is a language
> that deserves to be dropped yet.  I do think it has enough power to
> accomplish almost any task you throw at it, and for the good programmers
> out
> there you can get very clean and maintainable code.  The comments on the
> site are really silly and disregard business realities for simple bias.
> I've talked to so many ex-Ruby on Rails users and they've all dropped it
> for
> one reason or another and they are usually reasons I didn't even think of.
>
>   Any new programming language be it Perl, Java, or PHP should smack with,
> "Geez I couldn't even do this before".  I dropped Perl as soon as I
> started
> with PHP because it was better in so many respects as a language.  And
> when
> I started coding in Java I thought wow maybe I should have started out as
> a
> C programmer so I could be a Java programmer.  And that's another thing, I
> never got into C because there weren't real world business problems that I
> couldn't accomplish in Perl (there still aren't).
>
>   I'm not saying Ruby on Rails isn't a good skill but there were quite a
> few
> posts in the article who remind me why I'm a UNIX vs a Windows person.  I
> have the skills already to accomplish in UNIX because it's taught me to
> understand how everything works underneath.  Ruby on Rails is Windows, PHP
> is UNIX.  Both get the job done one is completely in your control.
>
> Alec
>
> On 9/30/07, Jason Rexilius <ja...@ho...> wrote:
> >
> > Mostly common sense, particularly the "PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES ARE LIKE
> > GIRLFRIENDS: THE NEW ONE IS BETTER BECAUSE *YOU* ARE BETTER"
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.oreillynet.com/ruby/blog/2007/09/7_reasons_i_switched_back_to_p_1.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > chiPHPug-discuss mailing list
> > chi...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chiphpug-discuss
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> chiPHPug-discuss mailing list
> chi...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chiphpug-discuss
>



-- 
http://rubygeek.com - my blog featuring: Ruby, PHP and Perl
http://DevChix.com - boys can't have all the fun